Post (hide subjects)	Posted by	When
Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	mpgxsvcd	3 months ago	5
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	mpgxsvcd	3 months ago	2
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	Ron Evers	3 months ago	2
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	Alumna Gorp	3 months ago	1
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	Ron Evers	3 months ago
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	JayBratcher	3 months ago
Clarification required	texinwien	3 months ago
Re: Clarification required	Ron Evers	3 months ago
Thanks, another couple of questions	texinwien	3 months ago
Re: Thanks, another couple of questions	Ron Evers	3 months ago
Beautiful shot, Ron	texinwien	3 months ago
Are we really doing this AGAIN?	kenw	3 months ago	17
Re: Yes we will do this again if it really does matter.	mpgxsvcd	3 months ago	6
Re: Yes we will do this again if it really does matter.	Anders W	3 months ago	13
Re: Are we really doing this AGAIN?	mpgxsvcd	3 months ago	1
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	Thomas Kachadurian	3 months ago	6
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	RicksAstro	3 months ago	8
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	ElginC	3 months ago	2
DxOmark "ISO" isn't ISO according to the International Standards Organization	MAubrey	3 months ago	7
Re: DxOmark "ISO" isn't ISO according to the International Standards Organization	mpgxsvcd	3 months ago	2
Not true.	texinwien	3 months ago	4
Re: Not true.	mpgxsvcd	3 months ago	1
Re: Not true.	texinwien	3 months ago	3
Re: Not true.	MAubrey	3 months ago	1
Re: Not true.	rialcnis	3 months ago
Re: Not true.	RicksAstro	3 months ago	5
Re: DxOmark "ISO" isn't ISO according to the International Standards Organization	mpgxsvcd	3 months ago	5
Re: DxOmark "ISO" isn't ISO according to the International Standards Organization	ElginC	3 months ago
Your lack of understanding is astounding.	texinwien	3 months ago	4
Re: DxOmark "ISO" isn't ISO according to the International Standards Organization	MAubrey	3 months ago	1
Re: DxOmark "ISO" isn't ISO according to the International Standards Organization	MAubrey	3 months ago	2
Re: DxOmark "ISO" isn't ISO according to the International Standards Organization	mpgxsvcd	3 months ago	1
Re: DxOmark "ISO" isn't ISO according to the International Standards Organization	MAubrey	3 months ago	3
Re: DxOmark "ISO" isn't ISO according to the International Standards Organization	MOD Aleo Veuliah	3 months ago	2
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	Macx	3 months ago	4
DxO tests RAW files. ISO is for JPEGs	Just Having Fun	3 months ago
Re: DxO tests RAW files. ISO is for JPEGs	mpgxsvcd	3 months ago	2
Re: DxO tests RAW files. ISO is for JPEGs	MAubrey	3 months ago
Here is your problem	Just Having Fun	3 months ago	5
Re: Here is your problem	mpgxsvcd	3 months ago	3
Re: Here is your problem	jim stirling	3 months ago	4
It was a ridiculous post with another motive	Just Having Fun	3 months ago	2
I think the reaction here	Art_P	3 months ago	1
Re: I think the reaction here	mpgxsvcd	3 months ago	1
Re: I think the reaction here	MAubrey	3 months ago	3
Re: Look at the DxOMark SNR (18%) Data	Detail Man	3 months ago	6
Thank you	Just Having Fun	3 months ago
Re: I think the reaction here	MAubrey	3 months ago
Re: Here is your problem	MAubrey	3 months ago
Re: Here is your problem	Anders W	3 months ago	3
You keep changing your story!	Just Having Fun	3 months ago
As long as	Art_P	3 months ago	3
No	Russ Houston	3 months ago
Read and Learn	texinwien	3 months ago	4
Not at all - it takes photo and met my expectations :)	reygon	3 months ago
Re: Not at all - it takes photo and met my expectations :) Indeed.	SeeRoy	3 months ago
What matters is exposure, not the ISO setting	noirdesir	3 months ago	5
Re: What matters is exposure, not the ISO setting	jim stirling	3 months ago	4
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you ?	Detail Man	3 months ago	4
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you ?	Pete Berry	3 months ago
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you ?	Detail Man	3 months ago
Is it true that Subway foot long subs are actually 11.5"!?	SirSeth	3 months ago	3
But if you compare the girth.....	Wallybipster	3 months ago	3
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	Henry Richardson	3 months ago	2
Excellent! Should be required reading	texinwien	3 months ago	1
Re: Excellent! Should be required reading	Anders W	3 months ago
Re: Excellent! Should be required reading	Detail Man	3 months ago
Hmmm	texinwien	3 months ago	1
Perhaps	Art_P	3 months ago	2
Re: Hmmm	Anders W	3 months ago
Re: Hmmm	texinwien	3 months ago
Re: Hmmm	Anders W	3 months ago
Re: Hmmm	texinwien	3 months ago
Re: Hmmm	Anders W	3 months ago
Re: Hmmm	noirdesir	3 months ago
Re: Hmmm	Anders W	3 months ago
Re: Hmmm	noirdesir	3 months ago
Re: Hmmm	Anders W	3 months ago
Re: Hmmm	noirdesir	3 months ago
Re: Hmmm	Anders W	3 months ago	1
Re: Hmmm	noirdesir	3 months ago
Re: Hmmm	Anders W	3 months ago
ACR EV post-scaling	Pete Berry	2 months ago
Re: Hmmm	Detail Man	3 months ago
Re: Hmmm	texinwien	3 months ago
Re: Hmmm ...	Detail Man	3 months ago
Re: Hmmm ...	texinwien	3 months ago
Re: Hmmmmmm ...	Detail Man	2 months ago
Re: Excellent! Should be required reading	exdeejjjaaaa	3 months ago
I imagine a scenario like the following	texinwien	3 months ago	2
Re: I imagine a scenario like the following	richarddd	3 months ago
Re: I imagine a scenario like the following	texinwien	3 months ago
Correction	texinwien	3 months ago
Re: I imagine a scenario like the following	richarddd	3 months ago
Misunderstanding	texinwien	3 months ago
Re: Misunderstanding	richarddd	3 months ago
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	RichRMA	3 months ago
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	LTZ470	3 months ago	1
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you - Nope	Brian Wadie	3 months ago
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	Detail Man	3 months ago	4
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	DonSantos	3 months ago	3
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	secretworld	3 months ago	4
Re: I agree, no arguments with this.	MOD Aleo Veuliah	3 months ago	3
Re: I agree, no arguments with this.	bluelemmy	3 months ago	1
That is the question	Art_P	3 months ago	1
Re: That is the question	MOD Aleo Veuliah	3 months ago
Re: I agree, no arguments with this.	MOD Aleo Veuliah	3 months ago	1
If the GH3 meters like the GH2	texinwien	3 months ago
Re: If the GH3 meters like the GH2	MOD Aleo Veuliah	3 months ago	1
Re: I agree, no arguments with this.	RicksAstro	3 months ago	1
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	RicksAstro	3 months ago	2
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	mpgxsvcd	3 months ago	2
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	Anders W	2 months ago	3
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	texinwien	2 months ago	1
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	secretworld	2 months ago
For the record, you're wrong	texinwien	2 months ago
Re: For the record, you're wrong	secretworld	2 months ago
Re: For the record, you're wrong	texinwien	2 months ago
Re: For the record, you're wrong	secretworld	2 months ago
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	Anders W	3 months ago	1
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	DonSantos	3 months ago
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	Anders W	3 months ago
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	DonSantos	3 months ago
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	Macx	3 months ago
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	Anders W	3 months ago
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you ?	Detail Man	3 months ago
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you ?	DonSantos	3 months ago
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you ?	Anders W	3 months ago
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you ?	Detail Man	3 months ago
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	cptobvious	3 months ago
Complain to DxO then	Just Having Fun	3 months ago	2
Re: Complain to DxO then	cptobvious	3 months ago
Re: Complain to DxO then	RicksAstro	3 months ago	1
Re: Complain to DxO then	MOD Aleo Veuliah	3 months ago	1
Re: Complain to DxO then	Anders W	3 months ago
Re: Complain to DxO then	DonSantos	3 months ago	3
Re: Complain to DxO then	Anders W	3 months ago
Re: Complain to DxO then	DonSantos	2 months ago
Re: Complain to DxO then	Anders W	2 months ago
Lighting may be different though.	Just Having Fun	2 months ago
Re: Lighting may be different though.	DonSantos	2 months ago	1
Re: Lighting may be different though.	MAubrey	2 months ago
Re: Lighting may be different though.	DonSantos	2 months ago
Re: Simple minded but simplified...	LTZ470	2 months ago
Re: Simple minded but simplified ...	Detail Man	2 months ago
Re: Simple minded but simplified...	Anders W	2 months ago
Re: Lighting may be different though.	zxaar	2 months ago
Re: Lighting may be different though.	Anders W	2 months ago
That's what exposure comp is for...	BJN	2 months ago	1
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	cptobvious	2 months ago

Forum

Parent

First

Next unread

Keyboard shortcuts:

FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads

Color scheme? Blue / Yellow

Editorial content

Product database

Community

Would you move to a full frame DSLR?	150
FLICKR	145
* this week through your m43 - 2013.05.20 *	82
Why is the 55-210 so big?	72
Is it OK to "steal" pictures for school ...	65
Got Flowers? VOLUME 3	64
Sony A mount cameras could go mirrorless in 2014	64
OMD Shutter shock revisited...and a possible ...	62
Do you change lenses in the fields?	62
To owners of M4/3 and D-SLRs: which came first?	49
Pentax FF rumor gaining steam	44
My Friend + his daughter for retouch	44
stolen D800 in Paris.	39
Why does my photo lack detail...?	38
Question for people who have used filters for ...	38
Canon 10mm vs 18mm for landscapes	36
Has digital stitching made high megapixel ...	36
I sold my Canon...	32
Struggling with new AF-S 80-400mm	28
*Monday Macro/Closeup 20 May 2013*	27