Forum indexMicro Four Thirds TalkChange forum

Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?

Started 4 months ago | Discussions thread

Forum

mpgxsvcd

Veteran Member • Posts: 7,213

Like?

Re: DxOmark "ISO" isn't ISO according to the International Standards Organization

In reply to MAubrey, 4 months ago

MAubrey wrote:

DxOmark "ISO" isn't ISO according to the International Standards Organization. They're measuring something completely different than what every camera manufacturer is measuring.

--
--Mike

That may be. However, Their method of measuring is consistent and the results are consistent across the board. Every other camera measures a higher exposure than the E-M5. In some cases that difference is a factor of two.

--
GH3, Hacked GH2, and Full Spectrum GF1 Sample movies
http://www.youtube.com/user/mpgxsvcd#play/uploads
GH3 Tips and Tricks
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hIMdxoGbNXU
GH2 Setup Walk through
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uROQbbiiO2I
http://vimeo.com/user442745
GH3, GH2, GF1 Pictures
http://www.dpreview.com/galleries/4222674355/albums

Reply Reply with quote Complain

Post (hide subjects)	Posted by	When
Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	mpgxsvcd	4 months ago	5
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	mpgxsvcd	4 months ago	2
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	Ron Evers	4 months ago	2
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	Alumna Gorp	4 months ago	1
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	Ron Evers	4 months ago
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	JayBratcher	4 months ago
Clarification required	texinwien	4 months ago
Re: Clarification required	Ron Evers	4 months ago
Thanks, another couple of questions	texinwien	4 months ago
Re: Thanks, another couple of questions	Ron Evers	4 months ago
Beautiful shot, Ron	texinwien	4 months ago
Are we really doing this AGAIN?	kenw	4 months ago	17
Re: Yes we will do this again if it really does matter.	mpgxsvcd	4 months ago	6
Re: Yes we will do this again if it really does matter.	Anders W	4 months ago	13
Re: Are we really doing this AGAIN?	mpgxsvcd	4 months ago	1
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	Thomas Kachadurian	4 months ago	6
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	RicksAstro	4 months ago	8
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	ElginC	4 months ago	2
DxOmark "ISO" isn't ISO according to the International Standards Organization	MAubrey	4 months ago	7
Re: DxOmark "ISO" isn't ISO according to the International Standards Organization	mpgxsvcd	4 months ago	2
Not true.	texinwien	4 months ago	4
Re: Not true.	mpgxsvcd	4 months ago	1
Re: Not true.	texinwien	4 months ago	3
Re: Not true.	MAubrey	4 months ago	1
Re: Not true.	rialcnis	4 months ago
Re: Not true.	RicksAstro	4 months ago	5
Re: DxOmark "ISO" isn't ISO according to the International Standards Organization	mpgxsvcd	4 months ago	5
Re: DxOmark "ISO" isn't ISO according to the International Standards Organization	ElginC	4 months ago
Your lack of understanding is astounding.	texinwien	4 months ago	4
Re: DxOmark "ISO" isn't ISO according to the International Standards Organization	MAubrey	4 months ago	1
Re: DxOmark "ISO" isn't ISO according to the International Standards Organization	MAubrey	4 months ago	2
Re: DxOmark "ISO" isn't ISO according to the International Standards Organization	mpgxsvcd	4 months ago	1
Re: DxOmark "ISO" isn't ISO according to the International Standards Organization	MAubrey	4 months ago	3
Re: DxOmark "ISO" isn't ISO according to the International Standards Organization	MOD Aleo Veuliah	4 months ago	2
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	Macx	4 months ago	4
DxO tests RAW files. ISO is for JPEGs	Just Having Fun	4 months ago
Re: DxO tests RAW files. ISO is for JPEGs	mpgxsvcd	4 months ago	2
Re: DxO tests RAW files. ISO is for JPEGs	MAubrey	4 months ago
Here is your problem	Just Having Fun	4 months ago	5
Re: Here is your problem	mpgxsvcd	4 months ago	3
Re: Here is your problem	jim stirling	4 months ago	4
It was a ridiculous post with another motive	Just Having Fun	4 months ago	2
I think the reaction here	Art_P	4 months ago	1
Re: I think the reaction here	mpgxsvcd	4 months ago	1
Re: I think the reaction here	MAubrey	4 months ago	3
Re: Look at the DxOMark SNR (18%) Data	Detail Man	4 months ago	6
Thank you	Just Having Fun	4 months ago
Re: I think the reaction here	MAubrey	4 months ago
Re: Here is your problem	MAubrey	4 months ago
Re: Here is your problem	Anders W	4 months ago	3
You keep changing your story!	Just Having Fun	4 months ago
As long as	Art_P	4 months ago	3
No	Russ Houston	4 months ago
Read and Learn	texinwien	4 months ago	4
Not at all - it takes photo and met my expectations :)	reygon	4 months ago
Re: Not at all - it takes photo and met my expectations :) Indeed.	SeeRoy	4 months ago
What matters is exposure, not the ISO setting	noirdesir	4 months ago	5
Re: What matters is exposure, not the ISO setting	jim stirling	4 months ago	4
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you ?	Detail Man	4 months ago	4
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you ?	Pete Berry	4 months ago
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you ?	Detail Man	4 months ago
Is it true that Subway foot long subs are actually 11.5"!?	SirSeth	4 months ago	3
But if you compare the girth.....	Wallybipster	4 months ago	3
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	Henry Richardson	4 months ago	2
Excellent! Should be required reading	texinwien	4 months ago	1
Re: Excellent! Should be required reading	Anders W	4 months ago
Re: Excellent! Should be required reading	Detail Man	4 months ago
Hmmm	texinwien	4 months ago	1
Perhaps	Art_P	4 months ago	2
Re: Hmmm	Anders W	4 months ago
Re: Hmmm	texinwien	4 months ago
Re: Hmmm	Anders W	4 months ago
Re: Hmmm	texinwien	4 months ago
Re: Hmmm	Anders W	4 months ago
Re: Hmmm	noirdesir	4 months ago
Re: Hmmm	Anders W	4 months ago
Re: Hmmm	noirdesir	4 months ago
Re: Hmmm	Anders W	4 months ago
Re: Hmmm	noirdesir	4 months ago
Re: Hmmm	Anders W	4 months ago	1
Re: Hmmm	noirdesir	4 months ago
Re: Hmmm	Anders W	4 months ago
ACR EV post-scaling	Pete Berry	3 months ago
Re: Hmmm	Detail Man	4 months ago
Re: Hmmm	texinwien	4 months ago
Re: Hmmm ...	Detail Man	4 months ago
Re: Hmmm ...	texinwien	4 months ago
Re: Hmmmmmm ...	Detail Man	3 months ago
Re: Excellent! Should be required reading	exdeejjjaaaa	4 months ago
I imagine a scenario like the following	texinwien	4 months ago	2
Re: I imagine a scenario like the following	richarddd	4 months ago
Re: I imagine a scenario like the following	texinwien	4 months ago
Correction	texinwien	4 months ago
Re: I imagine a scenario like the following	richarddd	4 months ago
Misunderstanding	texinwien	4 months ago
Re: Misunderstanding	richarddd	4 months ago
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	RichRMA	4 months ago
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	LTZ470	4 months ago	1
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you - Nope	Brian Wadie	4 months ago
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	Detail Man	4 months ago	4
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	DonSantos	4 months ago	3
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	secretworld	4 months ago	4
Re: I agree, no arguments with this.	MOD Aleo Veuliah	4 months ago	3
Re: I agree, no arguments with this.	bluelemmy	4 months ago	1
That is the question	Art_P	4 months ago	1
Re: That is the question	MOD Aleo Veuliah	4 months ago
Re: I agree, no arguments with this.	MOD Aleo Veuliah	4 months ago	1
If the GH3 meters like the GH2	texinwien	4 months ago
Re: If the GH3 meters like the GH2	MOD Aleo Veuliah	4 months ago	1
Re: I agree, no arguments with this.	RicksAstro	4 months ago	1
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	RicksAstro	4 months ago	2
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	mpgxsvcd	4 months ago	2
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	Anders W	3 months ago	3
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	texinwien	3 months ago	1
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	secretworld	3 months ago
For the record, you're wrong	texinwien	3 months ago
Re: For the record, you're wrong	secretworld	3 months ago
Re: For the record, you're wrong	texinwien	3 months ago
Re: For the record, you're wrong	secretworld	3 months ago
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	Anders W	4 months ago	1
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	DonSantos	4 months ago
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	Anders W	4 months ago
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	DonSantos	4 months ago
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	Macx	4 months ago
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	Anders W	4 months ago
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you ?	Detail Man	4 months ago
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you ?	DonSantos	4 months ago
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you ?	Anders W	4 months ago
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you ?	Detail Man	4 months ago
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	cptobvious	4 months ago
Complain to DxO then	Just Having Fun	4 months ago	2
Re: Complain to DxO then	cptobvious	4 months ago
Re: Complain to DxO then	RicksAstro	4 months ago	1
Re: Complain to DxO then	MOD Aleo Veuliah	4 months ago	1
Re: Complain to DxO then	Anders W	4 months ago
Re: Complain to DxO then	DonSantos	4 months ago	3
Re: Complain to DxO then	Anders W	4 months ago
Re: Complain to DxO then	DonSantos	3 months ago
Re: Complain to DxO then	Anders W	3 months ago
Lighting may be different though.	Just Having Fun	3 months ago
Re: Lighting may be different though.	DonSantos	3 months ago	1
Re: Lighting may be different though.	MAubrey	3 months ago
Re: Lighting may be different though.	DonSantos	3 months ago
Re: Simple minded but simplified...	LTZ470	3 months ago
Re: Simple minded but simplified ...	Detail Man	3 months ago
Re: Simple minded but simplified...	Anders W	3 months ago
Re: Lighting may be different though.	zxaar	3 months ago
Re: Lighting may be different though.	Anders W	3 months ago
That's what exposure comp is for...	BJN	3 months ago	1
Re: Is the EM5’s Miss-Stated ISO concerning to you?	cptobvious	3 months ago

Keyboard shortcuts:

FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads

Color scheme? Blue / Yellow

Editorial content

Product database

Community

Samsung gets it right - look here, Oly!	118
"Bokeh" overrated? I think so!	69
Why not a Pentax FullFrame - that's simple, ...	65
Which camera, driving me crazy!!!	60
New rumour on SAR	58
* Wed C&C (No Theme) Thread, Ed. 269, 13 06 19 *	56
If you had to choose between the 12mm or the ...	47
e-p5 What's not to love	47
If I owned an NEX-3 or NEX-5 variant, THIS is ...	46
Why 'Sony' not taken seriously?	41
Considering switching systems	40
$2000 mft Budget	40
*Monday Macro/Closeup June 17, 2013*	37
GF6 gets DxOmarked	34
SL1: Urban wildlife up close	34
Looks like Nikon's new 18-35 is kicking some butt!	32
Purchasing opinion	30
Spyder Calibration Software	30
All Shots are soft 7D	30
Which lens/ lenses to carry?	29