|
Re: nx200 tested on DxOMark!
In reply to shademaster,
3 months ago
|
shademaster wrote:
shademaster wrote:
random78 wrote:
DxoMark "scores" are rarely helpful. It is always much more useful to look at their graphs which tell a lot more.
To answer your question, the "sports iso" number is the highest iso at which camera could deliver an SNR of 30db AND a dynamic range of 9EV.
Thanks. Are those adjusted for pixel count ("print" style) or not ("screen" style)?
And you mean SNR of 30dB at 18% saturation (like their standard "SNR" measure)?
Yes the 30db SNR is their standard 18% gray SNR. I am pretty sure these are adjusted for "print", but I could be wrong. They have the details in one of the article on their website either in the publications/insights or in "About" menu. Btw I should add that apart from 30db and 9ev the 3rd requirement is 18-bit color depth.
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 2 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago |
   |
|
Connect with dpreview
|
