Moderators role

Detail Man wrote:

By the same logic (that pointing to a locked thread in order to engage in what has been deemed by the Editor in Chief as the "perfectly acceptable" process of discussing moderation policies, rules and interpretation - in this case surrounding thread-locking - constitutes a "no-no"), ...

... perhaps it may be that referring to the mere declaration of a "no-no" in order to discuss the nature and veracity of stated "no-nos" themselves constitutes a secondary "no-no" infraction ?

And, (following similar logic), perhaps it may be that making the point above itself may constitute a tertiary "no-no" ? If the answer to that question is "ya-ya", then we may all have to spend our recess-period writing neatly writing "ya-ya" 100 times on the blackboard using chalk with no eraser.

Our conversations "flow so freely" here on the "Open Talk" forum that I can hardly stand it ...