|
Re: nx200 tested on DxOMark!
In reply to de_klaas,
3 months ago
|
de_klaas wrote:
ChuckTa wrote:
If u compare raw at dpreview raw at iso3200, between nex 7 and nx200, the Samsung sensor clearly has better noise, yet the nex 7 iso score is much higher.
Unfortunately the studio comparison tool is pretty useless in this case. If you look at the hairs/feathers in the lower right corner you'll see that the NX200 performs a lot better than the Nex 7. However, if you look at the queen of hearts you get a whole different conclusion. Looks like the focussing was different between the 2 tests, but the strange thing is that you can see exactly the same in the NX210 images...
I don't think it's useless nor does it matter. the review pretty much summed up what the camera is capable of. pixel-peeping nitpickers do only the thing that they knew best, that is nitpicking.
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 2 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago |
   |
|
Connect with dpreview
|
