Do Fast Lenses Matter Anymore?

Started 3 months ago | Discussion thread
glokenpop
Forum MemberPosts: 72
Like?
Yes... wait no
In reply to bruxi, 3 months ago

bruxi wrote:

As I look at pricing for Canon 70-200L lenses, it looks like the price premium for a 2.8 is about $1,000 (average of IS and non-IS versions). A thousand bucks seems like a lot for basically one stop when new sensors are bring many more times that through rapid ISO improvements (like the 6D). There is so much more room now on ISO to crank it up with very little performance drop off. The notion of "fast lenses" feels more and more like dinosaur film thinking and makes very little sense to me from a value perspective.

For most people using an SLR who don't even know what subject isolation is then no it really doesn't and for a lot of people who don't want subject isolation again not really.

But for those not using SLRs I think this new breed of compacts with fast lenses are brilliant and really give them something that their camera phones can't. I think with the superzoom (yuck I know :P) they are the only form factor that is going to survive the onslaught of the smart phone.

For those of us who use subject isolation, well obviously they're all over fast lenses and you question is pure heresy.

And for folk like me that take pictures of fast moving subjects in poorly lit rooms well nup we're still not there - I need high iso and a stupidly fast lens.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow