|
Re: More on the Olympus underwater housing not being a good deal at any price.
In reply to clear glass,
4 months ago
|
clear glass wrote:
From your reply I infer that I could use an O ring made of a different material from the one Olympus sells for its housing.
Two possible problems: Could a filter of a different material possibly not make the housing watertight because it expands less under pressure?
Could it possibly require a lubricant that might damage the housing?
Thank you again for your patience and help.
If you have difficulty sourcing that O-ring, yes you can deviate in material. Changing the material may increase or decrease the performance of the O-ring. Ironically, we don’t know what the original design was actually tested to. I believe the specification stated was 4 atmospheres which is approximately 132 feet however a good design has additional safety buffer. And in reality most sport divers have no reason to venture to that depth and the probability is they have a much more exotic camera if they do. So the conundrum then becomes what do you want to accomplish based on your actual application.
With regard to the lubricant, silicon grease is ubiquitous and for this application there will be no reason to deviate.
Rick
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago |