f2.8 v. f4 IS

Started Feb 18, 2013 | Questions thread
minihorses01
Regular MemberPosts: 493
Like?
Re: f2.8 v. f4 IS
In reply to Chris Whittier, Feb 21, 2013

Chris Whittier wrote:

Hi-

Need a new lens and considering a Canon 70-200 L, but can't justify/afford the f2.8 IS II gem so considering a used f2.8 w/o IS v. the f4 IS and would appreciate thoughts or links to related thread.

As background/needs, I've been shooting with orig vintage 5D but just bought a new markIII and shoot mostly wildlife in dark forests (no flashes, no tripods) so trying to evaluate the 2.8 v. 4 IS in low light. My brain tells me the supposed 4 stops gained by IS outweigh the 1 stop given up (plus DOF) but since specs don't make images...

I've also handled the new Tamron SP 70-200/f2.8 VC, which would be another option but I can only find new to purchase, and I need to buy this week.

Thanks,

C

How about a used 70-200 f2.8L IS I?  It's an amazing lens.  Or a 100-400 f4.5-5.6L, perhaps one of the most versatile wildlife lenses.  I own the 70-200 f2.8L I.  It too is versatile since you can use a 1.4x or 2x teleconverter (or both with a bit of image degradation) on it (well you will be able to use the 2x with the firmware upgrade for the 5DMkIII coming in April).

-- hide signature --

David
www.PhotoSmithography.com
MM#377049
http://PhotoSmithography.smugmug.com/photos/226674570-Th.jpg
“Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the
experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do
so.” -- Douglas Adams

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow