Why Sigma 120-300 f/2.8

Started Feb 20, 2013 | Questions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
ForumParentFirstPreviousNext
Flat view
AngshuArun
AngshuArun Regular Member • Posts: 146
Why Sigma 120-300 f/2.8

I was wondering, why any one would like to buy the (new) Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 and why not to carry on with Nikon 70-200 f/2.8; the Nikon option looks better in every regards - be it price wise or weight wise. I would really like to know the specialty of the Sigma offering.

http://www.dpreview.com/products/compare/side-by-side?products=sigma_120-300_2p8_dg&products=sigma_120-300_2p8_ex_dg_os_hsm&products=sigma_120-300_2p8&products=nikon_70-200_2p8_vrii&products=nikon_70-200_2p8_vr&products=nikkor_70-200_4g_ed_vr&sortDir=ascending

 AngshuArun's gear list:AngshuArun's gear list
Nikon D5100 Nikon D600 Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G VR Nikon AF-S Nikkor 50mm f/1.8G +2 more
ANSWER:
ForumParentFirstPreviousNext
Flat view
ForumParentFirstPreviousNext
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow