How much more useful are ever higher pixel densities?

Started 4 months ago | Discussions thread
evoprox
Contributing MemberPosts: 888
Like?
Re: All megapixels are not created equal...
In reply to JimPearce, 4 months ago

JimPearce wrote:

dxomark is beginning to shed some light on this issue with their P-Mpix measurements. For instance, the 16MP D7000 offers only marginal real resolution gains over the 12MP D300 with any given lens. On the other hand, the 24MP D3X offers very substantial gains even over the 16MP D4. The issue comes down to pixel density - already high in the DX cameras - and the formula governing lens/camera system resolution: Rsystem^2=1/(1/Rlens^2 + 1/Rsensor^2). Only the very best lenses resolve enough (think lp/mm) to benefit substantially from resolutions beyond 16MP in DX cameras or 36MP in FX cameras.

--
Jim

Definetely. Another interesting term that has been used here and there is 'true/real resolution' (google). I recently ditched a box of NEXes, the 24MP NEX-7 among them, mainly due to the lack of native lenses that are up to that sensors resolution (and extreme pickyness) - again and again: shame, shame Sony ! The linear res. of that sensor is a mere 31% over that of the NEX-5 (14MP) but that translates straight into pure unforgiveness when it comes to shooting technique in situations where you want/need all you can get from that beast.

On a side note (slightly OT): ain't that strange that a $100something 30mm Sigma outresolves each and every lens Sony has to offer for their 'flagship' NEX by some stretch, including the $1100 24mm 'Zeiss'. My hat's off to Sigma !

--
'Have no fear of perfection - you'll never reach it.' Dali

Edited 4 months ago by evoprox
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow