|
Re: How to solve the NEX7 lens dilemma?
In reply to OvinceZ,
3 months ago
|
OvinceZ wrote:
blue_skies wrote:
OvinceZ wrote:
I have both the NEX7 and the camera of the year, the Olympus OMD. I use the NEX7 but seldom use the Olympus. The Sony delivers good results with the kit 18-55 lens but I would like a better quality lens with a wider and longer zoom, something like 16-80.
The dilemma is this: stick with E mount but be limited in choice and quality or 1. Get the EA2 adapter and buy a good Sony zoom or 2. Get the recent Metabones auto focus Canon adapter to use my collection of those lenses?
Metabones adapter is expensive and AF doesn't work with most Canon zoom lenses, eg 24-105, 16-35, 8-15, 17-40, 70-300L, that I have. AF works with 70-200 F4is. The others will work using manual focus. Same goes for my macro lenses.
Sony EA2 adapter is also expensive and additional lenses would have to be purchased, like the 16-50 or 16-80. AF is fast but this is a bulkier and more expensive option. If size gets too big I might as well use my Canon dslrs.
It would be valuable to hear how others have solved the NEX dilemma. Has anyone kept the 18-200 E lens as their walk around lens?
Vince
--
Everyone is an expert on dpreview!
Be patient?
A mid-range tele-zoom G lens should be announced this year. It is expected to be about 16-80 or so, and f/2.8-f/4.0, give or take. Could be a derivative of the SAL Zeiss version, we'll see.
If you don't mind bulk, the SAL1650 with constant f/2.8 gets great reviews. You'll need the LA-EA2 adapter, and you loose OSS. The assembly is comparable to the SEL18200 (orig) in bulk, and as expensive.
The SEL18200 is a great and versatile lens, but it is bulky as a 'walkaround' lens, and it is not a great lens for low light conditions.
If I were you, I'd consider the 1650PZ as a walkaround lens and the SEL35F18 as a lowlight lens.
Then wait another year for a high IQ zoom lens option, there are several on the roadmap.
--
Cheers,
Henry
Thanks, Henry. Waiting seems to be the name of the game with Sony. Will have a look at the 16-50 PZ. Will be great if they have an E-mount 16-80. Would be worth the wait.....if we knew for sure it was coming soon we would all wait.
Vince
--
Everyone is an expert on dpreview!
Just note that 1650PZ have horrible distortion with RAW. Which might and might not be a problem depending on your PP software of choice.
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 2 | ||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 5 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago |