From the Olympus Website--A little better translation than DPReview

Started Feb 14, 2013 | Discussions thread
Craig from Nevada
Contributing MemberPosts: 613Gear list
Like?
Re: Cost accounting and reality.
In reply to John King, Feb 17, 2013

One has to take out the provisions for fraudulent and corrupt behaviour from the accounts, IMNSHO. If one predicates one's crystal ball gazing with them in the picture, one is assuming that the fraudulent and corrupt conduct will remain as part of on-going operations. This assumption is fatally flawed ab initio, IMNSHO.

-

The bad behavior hurt them for sure.  In my opinion,  if the scandal had not occurred they would be in a tough spot now regardless.

They are a small manufacturer in a very competitive industry, one that is struggling. Their balance sheet might be better, but they would still be facing many of the same challenges. They may or may not have the right technology, but as with the consumer electronics industry in Japan, they are not really well-positioned with the right products.

Point and shoot is a dead end with the possible exception of the high-end XZ-2.

The DSLR market is full and Olympus now has about 1 percent of the market (In US political lingo we Olympus owners are the 1 percent). I am having trouble seeing how they can grow this market. I can't see DSLR doing much except maybe keep the E-5.  Olympus had their chance when the transition from film to digital occurred a decade ago and everyone was starting out.  Chances like that don't come everyday.

This leaves the micro FT market.  They are a leader here with OMD, but their line of lenses to this point doesn't really do much for me and the photography I like.  I like going out armed with my E-5, 12-60mm and 50-200mm. They can't match this right now with a bunch of primes and the entry level zooms.    I wonder if this line is profitable?  I figure the mircro line gets reduced to E-PL and the EM-2 (?).  The EP gets the boot. They try to do a professional OMD.

You point out that they have a joint venture with Sony and with it some capital of $500 million.To put this in perspective, 3 years at $170 million equals about that much.  The loss this year is twice what was estimated. Sales are just not there.

The reorganization has to stop the bleeding.   That will require fewer lines of cameras to support and few cameras.  If they stay in the imaging business, they will need to do what General Motors did, cut the brands down and the number of models.

-

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
DSLRNew
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow