14-35mm f/2.0 full-size sample with spectacular detail

For the very last time, my image is not over-processed. It is simply demosaiced with the amaze algorithm to extract maximum detail, no sharpening. One cannot create detail out of thin air, it's either there, or isnt.

Like a coward you backtrack from the very examples i point you to, or invent notions that leaf motion somehow creates chromatic aberration, LOL. Nice try. Did you check the shutter speeds in those, BTW?

All the Nikkor examples you posted are optically inferiour to the Zuikos, and dramatically so. Including the 35/1.8 sample above, which is just laughable in its poor optical correction. Because even you can see this, you start drumming on about "total system performance" and sensors, etc.

My post deals exclusively with the optics, and with your help it has now been shown again and again that the Zuikos are embarassingly better even at wide open aperture than the Nikkors at any optimum aperture. Every example shown has proven this, so we can now consider the matter settled.

I am not trying to convince you to buy anything. I wanted to post an example showing that - as best as can be shown on a 12MP E-5 - the Zuiko Digital lenses make the competing Nikkor / Canon zooms look bad. That this is probably mankind's finest SLR Zoom lens to date. I have succeeded uncontested so far.

When shown an unprocessed, unblurred RAW file, the resolution and microcontrast is so far beyond your frame of reference that you keep on accusing me of over-processing the file, without being able to point to any concrete factors other than pixel noise, which show a LACK of processing! Your precious Nikon will do this at the equivalent ISO 800 too with Amaze, trust me. But it won't solve the problem of your soft lenses or your compulsive need to be a troll - without anything to prove in this thread though, because you are simply a Nikon fanboy.