my 5D has done the same thing, the twist in the cables gives intermittent highlights, various angles give different patterns. I would think landscape shooters would be familiar with this

--
John Krumm
Juneau, AK

--
“You don’t take a photograph, you make it.” -Ansel Adams
blog.alatchinphotography(dot)com

--
Riley
any similarity to persons living or dead is coincidental and unintended
support 1022 Sunday Scapes'

does it look the same at 100% because the OP's shot looks like it's been tortured rather than processed

what I have done is agree with a fraternity that is familiar with this concept. That fraternity are landscape shooters. Does this shot look the same? It is a matter of light and cabling angles, but there is within a similar span

anyone want to ask me whats wrong with my 5D ?

--
The time you enjoy wasting is not wasted time.

--
Riley
any similarity to persons living or dead is coincidental and unintended
support 1022 Sunday Scapes'

what's wrong with your 5D? I've been going through shots with my Nikons and erm....i don't seem to get this unless there is something really strongly lined behind the cable then it becomes more a case of moire

just checking some E600 shots and erm........

--
The time you enjoy wasting is not wasted time.

Edited 3 months ago by illy

Reply Reply with quote Complain

Post (hide subjects)	Posted by	When
14-35mm f/2.0 full-size sample with spectacular detail	philosomatographer	3 months ago
Just when I was really convinced I was not ever going to get one...	RoelHendrickx	3 months ago
Re: 14-35mm f/2.0 full-size sample with spectacular detail	alatchin	3 months ago
I don't know what you did to it	SergeyGreen	3 months ago	2
Re: I don't know what you did to it	pris	3 months ago	1
See how the Eucalyptus' body (barkless)	SergeyGreen	3 months ago	3
Re: See how the Eucalyptus' body (barkless)	pris	3 months ago	1
Re: I don't know what you did to it	Big Ga	3 months ago	1
Re: I don't know what you did to it	illy	3 months ago
Re: I don't know what you did to it	jkrumm	3 months ago
Re: I don't know what you did to it	alatchin	3 months ago
Re: I don't know what you did to it	Rriley	3 months ago
Re: I don't know what you did to it	illy	3 months ago
anyone want to ask me whats wrong with my 5D ?	Rriley	3 months ago
Re: anyone want to ask me whats wrong with my 5D ?	illy	3 months ago
Re: anyone want to ask me whats wrong with my 5D ?	Rriley	3 months ago
Re: anyone want to ask me whats wrong with my 5D ?	illy	3 months ago
Re: anyone want to ask me whats wrong with my 5D ?	Rriley	3 months ago
Re: anyone want to ask me whats wrong with my 5D ?	illy	3 months ago	4
Re: anyone want to ask me whats wrong with my 5D ?	Rriley	3 months ago	1
Re: anyone want to ask me whats wrong with my 5D ?	illy	3 months ago	2
Re: 14-35mm f/2.0 full-size sample with spectacular detail	Mark9473	3 months ago	2
A couple of my own with the OMD and 14-35.	GBC	3 months ago
Re: A couple of my own with the OMD and 14-35.	illy	3 months ago	3
No sharpening	philosomatographer	3 months ago	1
Re: No sharpening	a Chap	3 months ago
Re: No sharpening	philosomatographer	3 months ago
Re: No sharpening	IanDavis	3 months ago
Re: No sharpening	Great Snoopy	3 months ago
Re: 14-35mm f/2.0 full-size sample with spectacular detail	Darrell500	3 months ago	1
Re: 14-35mm f/2.0 full-size sample with spectacular detail	philosomatographer	3 months ago
Re: 14-35mm f/2.0 full-size sample with spectacular detail	pris	3 months ago	2
Re: 14-35mm f/2.0 full-size sample with spectacular detail	oklaphotog	3 months ago	1
Re: 14-35mm f/2.0 full-size sample with spectacular detail	pris	3 months ago	1
Re: 14-35mm f/2.0 full-size sample with spectacular detail	oklaphotog	3 months ago	1
Re: 14-35mm f/2.0 full-size sample with spectacular detail	pris	3 months ago
Pris	Darrell500	3 months ago
Re: 14-35mm f/2.0 full-size sample with spectacular detail	Big Ga	3 months ago
Re: 14-35mm f/2.0 full-size sample with spectacular detail	pris	3 months ago
Re: 14-35mm f/2.0 full-size sample with spectacular detail	illy	3 months ago	3
Re: 14-35mm f/2.0 full-size sample with spectacular detail	Darrell500	3 months ago	1
Looks good	jkrumm	3 months ago
Re: Looks good	Darrell500	3 months ago
it is an amazing lens - too bad nothing like in on m4/3rds yet	John Mason	3 months ago	2
Maybe your too critical	bofo777	3 months ago	1
Quite the nice image.	Roger Engelken	3 months ago
I've played with my SHG's on the Em5	John Mason	3 months ago
John	Darrell500	3 months ago
I shoot mostly with the EM5 these days	John Mason	3 months ago
Re: I shoot mostly with the EM5 these days	Darrell500	3 months ago
Kind of reminds me of this,	SergeyGreen	3 months ago
Re: Kind of reminds me of this,	eaa	3 months ago	1
6MB full size JPEG at f/2.0	philosomatographer	3 months ago
It's no different	SergeyGreen	3 months ago
Re: It's no different	philosomatographer	3 months ago	1
I am not that good at comparison shots ..	SergeyGreen	3 months ago
Thanks for PROVING my point	philosomatographer	3 months ago	1
And this one...	philosomatographer	3 months ago	1
Re: And this one...	alatchin	3 months ago	1
Welcome	SergeyGreen	3 months ago
Re: Welcome	Paco 316	3 months ago	2
Oops!	SergeyGreen	3 months ago
Re: And the point you made?	Paco 316	3 months ago	2
This is not about brands either ..	SergeyGreen	3 months ago
Re: This is not about brands either ..	Paco 316	3 months ago
Re: This is not about brands either ..	alatchin	3 months ago
The blown should show less then ..	SergeyGreen	3 months ago
Re: The blown should show less then ..	alatchin	3 months ago
It actually makes no difference, but if you insist ..	SergeyGreen	3 months ago
Re: Welcome	philosomatographer	3 months ago	1
Re: 14-35mm f/2.0...lot's to like about this lens:	Calinature	3 months ago	2
Re: 14-35mm f/2.0 full-size sample with spectacular detail	Donald Duck	3 months ago
Re: 14-35mm f/2.0 full-size sample with spectacular detail	philosomatographer	3 months ago
Re: 14-35mm f/2.0 full-size sample with spectacular detail	Donald Duck	3 months ago	1
Re: 14-35mm f/2.0 full-size sample with spectacular detail	Darrell500	3 months ago	3
Re: 14-35mm f/2.0 full-size sample with spectacular detail	Geo Wharton	3 months ago	4
Re: 14-35mm f/2.0 full-size sample with spectacular detail	Jolly Oly	3 months ago
Re: 14-35mm f/2.0 full-size sample with spectacular detail	Darrell500	3 months ago
Truly a great lens...	Simon Cowell	3 months ago
But also a stupid discussion	erichK	3 months ago	1
Re: But also a stupid discussion	bofo777	3 months ago
Re: But also a stupid discussion	Rriley	3 months ago
Where have the other pixels gone? Viewer 2 process possible?	Kevin Sutton	3 months ago
Re: Where have the other pixels gone? Viewer 2 process possible?	philosomatographer	3 months ago
I don't see it that way	SergeyGreen	3 months ago
Re: I don't see it that way	philosomatographer	3 months ago
Do we really need to go through it?	SergeyGreen	3 months ago
Re: Where have the other pixels gone? Viewer 2 process possible?	illy	3 months ago
Re: Where have the other pixels gone? Viewer 2 process possible?	philosomatographer	3 months ago
Re: Where have the other pixels gone? Viewer 2 process possible?	illy	3 months ago	4
Exactly.	MOD skeys	3 months ago	1
Re: Exactly.	MOD carizi	3 months ago	1
Re: Exactly.	Jolly Oly	3 months ago
Re: Exactly.	Rriley	3 months ago
Jolly Oly	MOD carizi	3 months ago	2
Some questions for you, Jolly Oly	MOD skeys	3 months ago	2
Re: 14-35mm f/2.0 full-size sample with spectacular detail	Big Ga	3 months ago	2
Re: 14-35mm f/2.0 full-size sample with spectacular detail	Donald Duck	3 months ago
Same image, more conventional RAW decoding	philosomatographer	3 months ago
Re: Same image, more conventional RAW decoding	Kevin Sutton	3 months ago	1
That looks much better.	windsprite	3 months ago
Why no ACR?	philosomatographer	3 months ago
Re: Why no ACR?	Kevin Sutton	3 months ago
Re: Same image, more conventional RAW decoding	illy	3 months ago	1
The lenses have never been the problem.....	Stacey_K	3 months ago	2
I feel the opposite about it	philosomatographer	3 months ago	1
There are two things to mention here	SergeyGreen	3 months ago
Re: There are two things to mention here	alatchin	3 months ago
Re: There are two things to mention here	Stacey_K	3 months ago
Re: There are two things to mention here	alatchin	3 months ago	2
Re: There are two things to mention here	Stacey_K	3 months ago
Re: There are two things to mention here	Rriley	3 months ago
Does anyone here actually PRINT?	Kevin Sutton	3 months ago
Yes, but ..	SergeyGreen	3 months ago
Re: Does anyone here actually PRINT?	Silverback46	3 months ago
Re: Does anyone here actually PRINT?	Kevin Sutton	3 months ago
Re: Does anyone here actually PRINT?	Silverback46	3 months ago
You did?	SergeyGreen	3 months ago
Re: You did?	philosomatographer	3 months ago	1
Re: I feel the opposite about it	Rriley	3 months ago
Re: I feel the opposite about it	Donald Duck	3 months ago
Re: I feel the opposite about it	alatchin	3 months ago	1
And so ..	SergeyGreen	3 months ago
Re: And so ..	alatchin	3 months ago
So what is more important to you?	SergeyGreen	3 months ago
Re: So what is more important to you?	neil1c2000	3 months ago
If I was not clear ..	SergeyGreen	3 months ago
Re: If I was not clear ..	Darrell500	3 months ago
Re: If I was not clear ..	illy	3 months ago
Re: If I was not clear ..	alatchin	3 months ago
Re: If I was not clear ..	Messier Object	3 months ago
But with noise?	SergeyGreen	3 months ago
Re: I feel the opposite about it	Donald Duck	3 months ago	1
Re: I feel the opposite about it	alatchin	3 months ago
Re: I feel the opposite about it	Donald Duck	3 months ago
Re: I feel the opposite about it	Rriley	3 months ago
Re: I feel the opposite about it	Donald Duck	3 months ago
Re: I feel the opposite about it	Rriley	3 months ago
Re: I feel the opposite about it	Donald Duck	3 months ago
Re: I feel the opposite about it	Rriley	3 months ago
Re: I feel the opposite about it	Donald Duck	3 months ago
Re: I feel the opposite about it	alatchin	3 months ago
Re: I feel the opposite about it	Donald Duck	3 months ago	1
Re: I feel the opposite about it	alatchin	3 months ago
Re: I feel the opposite about it	Donald Duck	3 months ago
Re: I feel the opposite about it	alatchin	3 months ago
Re: I feel the opposite about it	Donald Duck	3 months ago	1
Re: I feel the opposite about it	alatchin	3 months ago	2
Re: 14-35mm f/2.0 is a fine lens	dave gaines	3 months ago	1
That's a great wrap-up, Dave. NT	MOD skeys	3 months ago

Keyboard shortcuts:

FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads

Color scheme? Blue / Yellow

Editorial content

Product database

Community

I would like to discuss the aesthetics of ...	86
can you tell the IQ/ISO difference game: ...	58
Is Apple getting people by their brain-balls?	55
Panasonic G6. It really has an old, bad sensor?	47
Would you take your D800E and lenses on a trip ...	45
Photographer = Loner?	45
What's the status of the RED problem with ...	43
* This Week Through YOUR m4/3 2013.05.25 *	38
More artistic and less photorealistic	33
Smallest case/bag for X-E1	33
80-400VR/D800e does Florida Birds	33
Advice needed - Computer for Photo Editing	32
IBIS vs Tripod?	32
Flower Closeup Shots	30
“Photo of the Week” – #4 (May 24 – May 30, 2013)	30
What companies should Sigma buy in coming years?	30
Is there a SIMPLE flash for Canon DSLR's?	29
Ricoh GR lens performance test images	29
Important: Note update, about this thread, ...	26
Cannot get sharp focus when tracking playing ...	26