X-E1 vs Canon 5D Mark III - continued

Started 3 months ago | Discussions thread
nixda
Contributing MemberPosts: 965
Like?
Re: X-E1 vs Canon 5D Mark III - continued
In reply to deednets, 3 months ago

deednets wrote:

Apart from copying other people's "verdicts" and whole heartedly agreeing with it, is there anything in the other comments, "verdicts" etc of other people ont he net or is it just the one that apparently suits you that is the truly right one?

Very well observed.

Must say that after many years ont he Nikon forum it amazes me to see how personal people here take the issues around a sensor and the camera technology.

But praise the Lord you world view is ok again since one tested concluded that it is all bollocks around the Fuji sensor, well done Sir!

I will keep on living in my deluded little world and will possibly keep on using this little piece of technical hocus-pocus ... Have read the report by Martin Dopplebauer too but wouldn's take it as Gospel like I will always take those reports with a grain of salt, just like your post here!

Good, then indeed you fully got the point of my post.

I am curious though as to what the piurpose is of your thread? Some balance?

The point was that quite a few people lift single statements, usually out of context, from reviews to make their case, just like the poster I responded to. I just pointed out that one can lift any other statement and make a completely different case.

Most level-headed people see through that kind of babble, just like you and others who have responded. But by far not everyone, that's why posts with 'single-statement verdicts' get so much traction. And some people bank on precisely that.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow