|
Re: I guess that 'awful' 100-400mm forgot to be bad.
In reply to CanonKen,
3 months ago
|
CanonKen wrote:
Yes, I am baiting a bit with the title, but despite the endless gear-hate (all products and brands), the truth is all but the worst lenses by a given vendor are able to do great things. This is by no means a good picture, or a particularly interesting bird (I think it is the one that poops on your car just after you get out of the car wash...), but to be able to quickly point a camera at a tiny, fast-moving creature this far away, and get this as a result speaks volumes to how lucky we are to have the gear that is available now.
This is a 100% (1000x1500 pixels) crop shown.

I'm very happy with mine.
http://i74.photobucket.com/albums/i280/sacentre/Photography/New%20Zealand/IMG_9462.jpg
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago |