I guess that 'awful' 100-400mm forgot to be bad.

Started Feb 15, 2013 | Discussions thread
sacentre
Senior MemberPosts: 1,170
Like?
Re: I guess that 'awful' 100-400mm forgot to be bad.
In reply to CanonKen, Feb 16, 2013

CanonKen wrote:

Yes, I am baiting a bit with the title, but despite the endless gear-hate (all products and brands), the truth is all but the worst lenses by a given vendor are able to do great things. This is by no means a good picture, or a particularly interesting bird (I think it is the one that poops on your car just after you get out of the car wash...), but to be able to quickly point a camera at a tiny, fast-moving creature this far away, and get this as a result speaks volumes to how lucky we are to have the gear that is available now.

This is a 100% (1000x1500 pixels) crop shown.

I'm very happy with mine.

http://i74.photobucket.com/albums/i280/sacentre/Photography/New%20Zealand/IMG_9462.jpg

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow