11 hours ago
|
Re: Why 35mm, why f1.4?
In reply to brightcolours,
3 months ago
|
brightcolours wrote:
Why 35mm? Any reason for that? Apparently not, since you think of 50mm too?
I need the angle of view that a 35mm gives at about 0.3-0.5m distance. 50mm will be a bit on the narrow side, but I can move a bit further away if this gives a better focus field. I can't go much further than 0.5m though, so 50mm is stretching it. So, thus this trade-off.
Why f1.4? Any reason to think of such a large aperture? Diffraction softening should only set in past f4/5.6...
I need shallow DOF.
What kind of scientific project is it? MF will give better focus consistency.
I will need AF, the distance will alter from sample to sample slightly, and I'm looking at sub-millimeter DOF's.
For this project, I will be taking pictures of low contrast objects at near distance, probably 0.3-0.5m. I need the "entire" frame to be captured in "perfect" focus left-right (top-down less important).
Focal length determines the distance. So again, why 35mm? Unless that has a real reason, I would think that you'd even be better served with a 1960's Nikkor 55mm f3.5 micro, pre-Ai, MF lens.
f3.5 is too small, but thank's for the suggestion.
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago |
   |
|
Connect with dpreview
|
