|
Why 35mm, why f1.4?
In reply to andreben,
3 months ago
|
andreben wrote:
Hi everyone,
I need a 35mm 1.4 for my Nikon D800 (or alternatively 50mm 1.4 if advantages are obvious) for a scientific project. The main criteria, in additional to sharpness, are:
Why 35mm? Any reason for that? Apparently not, since you think of 50mm too?
Why f1.4? Any reason to think of such a large aperture? Diffraction softening should only set in past f4/5.6...
1. Focus field flatness
The wider the lens, the more chance for focus curvature.
2. AF accuracy centre-frame
What kind of scientific project is it? MF will give better focus consistency.
For this project, I will be taking pictures of low contrast objects at near distance, probably 0.3-0.5m. I need the "entire" frame to be captured in "perfect" focus left-right (top-down less important).
Focal length determines the distance. So again, why 35mm? Unless that has a real reason, I would think that you'd even be better served with a 1960's Nikkor 55mm f3.5 micro, pre-Ai, MF lens.
I've been eyeing the Sigma 35mm 1.4, but haven't been able to figure out much regarding the focus field on this lens. 35mm is the ideal focal lenght, but I can consider going to 50mm if the focus field is significantly improved.
All help appreciated!
Cheers,
Andreas
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago |