|
Re: da* 16-50 f2.8 artificially restricted to f2.8?
In reply to Meuh,
3 months ago
|
Let me answer some/all you quetsions
1 the stopper you see sets the lens to f2.8@50 a cam follower shuts the irsi down as you zoom to maintain constant aperture.
2 If the lens are individually calibrated (rather than mass knock out) then every lens will have a slightly different stopper position, This is caused by slight changes in linkages and/or blade position.
Though the difference in Brightness your seeing coudl be an improperly calibrated iris I suspect not.....see below.
3 A lens 'Brightness' is related to T factor not F stop.
F stop = pupil size
T factor = light transference
In photography we only talk F-stop but in reality the exposure is F-stop + light lost through elements.
This T rating can affect lens anything up to a stop, in you example it shows the 16-50 is a more complex beast than the 50-135 .
It one of the things that should make the da560 a clever design by Pentax (less elements = more light)
--
My PPG
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/andrewwaldram
My Photo Stream
http://www.flickr.com/photos/awaldram/
1x.com
http://1x.com/artist/awaldram/wall
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago |