DXOMark results for GH3

Started 3 months ago | Discussion thread
Detail Man
Forum ProPosts: 12,974
Like?
Re: Panasonic up for a Porcine Achievement Award
In reply to Anders W, 3 months ago

Anders W wrote:

Detail Man wrote:

Anders W wrote:

Chez Wimpy wrote:

Anders W wrote:

I don't. I think IR's interview with Olympus strongly indicates that it is made by Sony. You don't.

I just think it shows what a great company Panasonic is. They develop this incredible sensor, leaps and bounds over what they managed to date, and allow Olympus to have exclusive use for nearly a year - including their bargain priced models - putting all of Panasonic's cameras to shame. Not only that, they went and released another model with the older-GH2 sensor fab in the interim just to further EM5 sales, and winked to the crowd "hey, mums the word!" when the Olympus president declared that the EM5 used a Sony sensor. Then even held back from making the GH3 implementation multi-aspect to maintain an advantage over Olympus.

Occam's razor couldn't even manage melted butter at this point, but I think the pertinent issue is: "Who cuts melted butter anyways?" Seriously Anders, I don't know what reality YOU are living in!

Right! Don't know how on earth I could have overlooked how Occam actually slices his baloney.

Apologies for pedantries, but I cannot help but note that this would be properly spelled "bologna":

What the h**k. Here I do my very best to adapt to the vernacular of the forum and you dare to correct me! Besides, I am sure Occam himself would much have preferred real Mortadella to that slimy stuff. Wonder what expression the Italians use? Here in Sweden we say "skära kuttingen" and don't you dare try to correct me on that.

Your best answer so far. I hope You keep on improving ! I have the courage to dare to spell out the phrase "what the heck". "Deal with it" (as the children like to say), Pedantor King of the North !

"Skära kuttingen" sounds (to this mono-lingual American bumpkin) like some sort of veneral disease.

It seems that "Wild Willy of Ockham" (understanding the trivialities of human thought) would have "summed-up" these petty techno-tribal squables about jingoistic "team colors" pretty darn fast:

Ockham is sometimes considered an advocate of conceptualism rather than nominalism, for whereas nominalists held that universals were merely names, i.e. words rather than existing realities, conceptualists held that they were mental concepts, i.e. the names were names of concepts, which do exist, although only in the mind. Therefore, the universal concept has for its object, not a reality existing in the world outside us, but an internal representation which is a product of the understanding itself and which "supposes" in the mind the things to which the mind attributes it; that is, it holds, for the time being, the place of the things which it represents. It is the term of the reflective act of the mind.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_of_Ockham#Nominalism

There's a new kid in the sanitarium these days. He's bad, and he's nationwide. Deal with it !!! ...

Edited 3 months ago by Detail Man
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow