When is 50mm NOT 50mm?

Started 3 months ago | Question thread
Dennis
Forum ProPosts: 11,533
Like?
Re: When is 50mm NOT 50mm?
In reply to sean lancaster, 3 months ago

sean lancaster wrote:

Radu Iordache wrote:

I get your point BUT: you do not get a certain system or camera for life. Therefore you need to have a common reference system which is the 35mm equivalent. One should know what to expect if one would put any lens on any camera. You only have to know the crop factor of the camera and the calculation is not rocket science so I think it is a useful information.

Exactly right, but it even goes beyond staying with the same camera for life. I pretty much learned photography by looking at images on Flickr and studying which lens was used as well as other EXIF data and also by reading photography books. Most of the books are written by authors/photographers using a full frame camera. So, I see a photo in the book that I want to replicate and it helps to know that I won't get the same frame of reference using the 50 on my NEX as the author got using a 50 on the FF camera. If you're going to communicate with other photographers and across systems then the equivalency to FF helps to better draw comparisons. Even though it's confusing to think about the crop factor, it does serve a purpose to be knowledgeable of the conversion and why it's important (e.g., when you need to apply it or not).

All fair enough - I agree that the conversion is useful more often than when first learning a new format.  However, I just wanted to point out to the OP that it is absolutely not necessary (as I interpreted Radu's first post) to convert in order to know the FOV you're going to get from a lens.

- Dennis

--
Gallery at http://kingofthebeasts.smugmug.com

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow