
|
Yes - mostly.
In reply to 2eyesee,
4 months ago
|
I have the RX100 and still use it in cases where I need a really light camera (climbing) but also recently picked up the E-PM2 with the kit lens and a bunch of gorgeous oly primes including the 12, 17, 45 and 75mm.
IMHO the Olympus will do a better job in most cases than the RX100, even with the relatively cheap 14-42mm lens. The one thing I like about the RX100 is that you can shoot at f/2 and get some serious DOF due to the small sensor. This is handy for low light situations. Of course the blessing is also a curse since the smaller sensor doesn't do high ISO as well as the 4/3, especially in shadow areas. It's a real toss up if you're better off with the f/1.8 of the RX100 or the larger sensor of the E-PM2 for low light.
Obviously once you start putting some of those silver primes on the Olympus the IQ starts pulling away from the RX100 pretty darn quick. I just printed a pretty big panorama from the RX100 (10"x30") and I still think it's an amazing little camera in some cases.
--
Vern Dewit
Calgary, Alberta Canada
http://www.explor8ion.com
http://verndewit.com/
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | 2 | ||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago |