How limiting is lack of image stabilization in Pany bodies?

Started 3 months ago | Questions thread
s_grins
Veteran MemberPosts: 6,279
Like?
Re: How limiting is lack of image stabilization in Pany bodies?
In reply to Alumna Gorp, 3 months ago

Alumna Gorp wrote:

BingoCharlie wrote:

s_grins wrote:

I'm old school man who grown up without any IS, so I'm not addicted to have it. I do not trust IS and do not use it, moreover, I'm suspicious about sensor on suspender inside camera, and I think this is the reason for what is known as a "shutter shock"

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure shutter shock has been documented in Panasonic cameras, too.

Shutter shock, as in poor technique, its the only shutter shock I`ve ever seen.

Well, here you're skeptical to large numbers of complains

If IS is not a problem why have I been seeing threads from Panasonic users wanting Panasonic versions of Olympus primes with in lens IS.

Well, and here you tend to believe. I've never asked for OIS from either O and P. I have to admit that my longest focus lens is a Oly 40-150.

IS can be good for macro as well, extremely good if you like using macro legacy lenses.

Here I'm with you, but tripod/monopod and high shatter speed work good for me

I have both Panasonic in lens IS for My G series camera and inbody IS with my OMD, the two systems are worlds apart.

Sure they are. But I do not have Oly bodies, and I do not use OIS, and I do not feel need in any IS

--
Looking for equilibrium...

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow