How limiting is lack of image stabilization in Pany bodies?

Started 3 months ago | Question thread
bowportes
Contributing MemberPosts: 636
Like?
Re: How limiting is lack of image stabilization in Pany bodies?
In reply to Skeeterbytes, 3 months ago

Skeeterbytes wrote:

Hi Len,

I think it's reasonable to go with a Panny body so long as you can work around this limitation (lack of IS with legacy and non-OIS lenses). With that said, I chose Oly specifically because of IBIS when picking a dslr system and when selecting my first ยต4/3 camera.

Conservatively, it gives an extra one to two stops that become a distinct advantage in a lot of scenarios. Good high-ISO performance has made lack of IS a problem less often, but I've learned to leverage IBIS in situations I'd not bother to shoot otherwise.

Many fine OIS lenses are available, but you can rest assured wide and superwide won't typically be aming them. So a lot of the answer depends on your gear and your goals.

While I agree with most of what you say, I'd certainly call the POIS-stabilized Panny 12-35mm "wide;" it (24mm film-equivalent) used to be categorized as the beginning point of ultra-wide. And the various 14-42mm and 14-45mm OIS stabilized Pannys certainly include "wide," even though it is not a fast wide. With the unstabilized Oly 12mm, one should be able to shoot as slow as 1/30th and get consistently good results. At 1/15th some of the shots would still be sharp.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow