|
Re: This is wrong
In reply to sigala1,
3 months ago
|
sigala1 wrote:
Dylthedog wrote:
I'm not sure what is wrong exactly - I think that you're agreeing that the 14mm is no better than the kit lenses.
I haven't looked at what the 'snobby' prime shooters said yet but will check it out later
Well, you said the following:
"The Panny 20mm is pretty much welded to the camera and right now I use the kit if I want wider, but clearly that's not going to deliver the best quality."
And actually, I think the kit WILL deliver the best quality you are going to get at 14mm. However, if you want to spend a lot of money, the 12mm f/2.0 lens has the absolute best image quality you are going to get at that focal length.
Image quality on the 9-18mm is inferior to the kit lens..
Image quality on the 7-14mm is a mixed bag. Sharpness is there, but there's also a lot of CA and flare issues (and the flare looks purple on E-M5, maybe consider getting a cheap G3 body to go with it, or whatever Panasonic is on sale really cheap). But overall, your best choice in m43 if you want to go REALLY wide.
Ah, I see. Forgive me for using the logic that has proven correct over many generations of cameras/systems in that the kit lens is OK but rarely (note I said rarely) the best available at any given focal length.
I'm not a 'prime snob' but past experience has shown me that it takes a very special zoom to equal a prime for a given job. Of course if the job in hand requires a range the flexibility of a zoom is fantastic and I use zooms all the time - for my FF camera I generally use a wide zoom, a walk around zoom and probably the best lens I own is also a zoom - the venerable 70-200 2.8 IS II. I use primes on my FF when I know the shooting will be limited such as macro, portraits or studio work because they are, generally, sharper.
However, for my MFT system I want different things - the first of which is small. What I like is that I can fit my E-PL5 and a bunch of accessories in bag that I can only get my 5DIII in - almost a complete system
What I'd quite like is a small wide prime, a small standard prime and small portrait prime with the kit as nice flexible backup for social stuff; I've got all but the wide lens at the moment. Of course, I only want a prime if it offers better quality like they used to...
The small factor of the 14mm is nice, but I don't see any advantage if it's no better than a lens I already own. I don't want/need anything as wide the the Panny 7-14mm which is why the Oly 12mm is attractive to me - it's just a little wider than my 14-45 kit and brighter too. What put me off is the price if the photozone pics are truly representative.
Thanks for your steer on the 9-18mm, it wasn't really on the list but I know it has fans
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 2 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 1 |