Canon 70-300 IS USM vs 70-300 L IS USM

Started 4 months ago | Discussions thread
yabokkie
Regular MemberPosts: 448
Like?
Re: Canon 70-300 IS USM vs 70-300 L IS USM, none
In reply to Myer, 4 months ago

I think 70-200/2.8LIS2 will save you money at the end of the day.

the old none IS version was very good. same image quality at significantly lower price but the new one is from another world. for 70-300LIS, I'd rather call it "semi-L" one. the quality is somewhere between L and non-L ones.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow