|
Re: Canon 50mm F 0.95 lens
In reply to PreetinderBajwa,
3 months ago
|
PreetinderBajwa wrote:
1. Is it worth getting this lens over the 50mm 1.2, in terms of bokeh and picture quality ?No. Any TV lens is hardly going to win in picture quality against a dedicated SLR lens.
2. Is the price fair at USD 2700 ?
For the 50/1.0L maybe... but for a legacy TV lens? Not even Zeiss commands that kind of price.
3. Is the rangefinder or is the TV version the rage/ the one with the dream quality ?
Rangefinder 50/0.95 is the "dream lens"
BTW I saw the 50mm F 1.0, also which was ridiculously priced at USD 6575/-.
Which probably explains the pricing of the TV lens...
Hope to get your thoughts and inputs to help me save money or making a right investment !
Save your money. There are other, much cheaper, 50/0.XX lenses for APS-C on mirrorless. In fact, one of the more interesting lenses is the upcoming 40/0.85
http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/fastest-new-mirrorless-lens-ever-ibelux-40mm-f0-85/
Then there is the highly regarded Noktor, which you can get somewhat cheaper without the rangefinder coupling.
--
-CW
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago |
   |
|
Connect with dpreview
|
