|
Re: m43 is no impediment to inept razor-thin DOF portraits
In reply to Ryan Williams,
3 months ago
|
Ryan Williams wrote:
This is true if you hold the f-number constant while adjusting the focal length to have the same field of view on the smaller sensor, but holding the f-number constant does not produce an equivalent lens. The f-number has to be scaled with the crop factor.
It's the available lenses for a format that determine the depth of field you can achieve, and this is where FF has the advantage: there are many FF lenses that have no small-format equivalents. When there is an equivalent in absolute specs, often the small-format lens has more imperfections.
I agree that APS-C is a good compromise between size & weight and DoF control, given the currently available lenses. The large-aperture lenses that Fuji and Zeiss have been cooking up for X-mount (and even the Samyang f/2.8 fisheye) have vastly improved the value of APS-C in my eyes.
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 2 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 2 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 3 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 2 | ||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | 2 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 3 | ||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 1 |