PROOF THAT D3200 DOES NOT SUCK

Started 3 months ago | Discussion thread
pavi1
Veteran MemberPosts: 3,375
Like?
Re: PROOF THAT D3200 DOES NOT SUCK
In reply to apaflo, 3 months ago

apaflo wrote:

pavi1 wrote:

apaflo wrote:

What if you need to bracket exposure on some object that is going to exist for only 1 second and never re-occur, which might be the case with wildlife photography.

You bought the wrong camera.

You missed the point. I didn't buy the wrong camera. I can pick either a D3S or a D4 for that purpose. And have chosen those because for the purpose the D3200 sucks.

What if you want a high speed sequence of at least 10 pictures in a two second period (a very common thing with sporting events).

You bought the wrong camera.

You have still missed the point. See above.

What about using lenses like the Nikkor 85mm f/1.4D, or the 135mm f/2 DC AF-D, that have a character all their own... and will not auto focus with a D3200.

You bought the wrong camera.

Even if I use my D800, I can use either my 85mm f/1.4D or my 135mm f/2 lens.

You are still missing the point. For those lenses, the D3200 sucks.

Next time you need a vehicle to tow a boat don't buy a tiny one.

Still not getting the point are you! A tiny vehicle sucks at towing boats.

On the other hand, as I've clearly stated, there are reasons to get a D3200 and it does not suck at what it can do. It can take certain kinds of images at a lower cost than any other current Nikon model DSLR. Missing that point sucks too...

Yes we get your point, for breading horses a donkey sucks.

Now we all agree.

--
Everything happens for a reason. #1 reason: poor planning
WSSA #44

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow