Ridiculous Fuji X20 Claims Locked

that is correct. the raw converter software played a part on handling the raf files. when I first got the XE-1, I asked for suggestions on what converters were best for the RAF files, because I was having trouble getting great results while using Adobe.

personally, from what I'm getting with the X-trans, it is very capable of going head to head with previous FF bodies. of course it would lose out with the higher MP FF and premium glass combo, but the performance of the XE-1 at higher sensitivities could not be easily pushed around nor ignored. I'm not sure what the OP's intention is or what he is mad about. what I see is he's mad about the X10 and X-trans, yet failed to make sensible argument about the relationship at all. I didn't even find a single connection to verify such claim to disprove Fuji's X-Trans performance. that is why it's wise to just wait for the camera to come out, then let the fireworks start. so far, this thread has proved nothing useful of disproving anything about the X-trans. just mere speculation basing on a non- X-trans camera.

if there was something the OP has achieved, that is to put everyone on a loop with no clear direction at all. just some pointless arguments and personal feelings and speculations.

anyway, this is about the X20, not the X10. a camera which have an X-trans sensor that the OP doesn't have a data on.