Ridiculous Fuji X20 Claims Locked

Started 3 months ago | Discussion thread
This thread is locked.
flektogon
Contributing MemberPosts: 728
Re: Ridiculous Fuji X20 Claims
In reply to AngryCorgi, 3 months ago

AngryCorgi wrote:

Well, again you have to pay attention to DXOmark data. Their plot of SNR is SNR vs. ISO.

X-S1 (2/3" 12MP EXR CMOS) vs RX-100 (1" 20MP CMOS) vs E-P1 (4/3rds 12MP CMOS)

And when you speak in terms of ISO sensitivity, you may compare in terms of EV. The difference between ISO800 and ISO1600 = 1EV, for instance. Here you can draw a horizontal line across most points on this graph and see that when the SNR is equal for these three cameras, the Fuji generally lags by approximately 1EV. It's not that difficult to understand, I think.

--
-AC-

What was the Fuji setting? 6Mp or 12Mp?  For 12Mp the lagging like 1EV is not so bad. But for 6Mp it would be pretty serious lagging behind the Sony (especially).

Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow