|
Re: XE1+35mm vs Leica M Monochrom + Lux 50
In reply to Imagefoundry,
3 months ago
|
Imagefoundry wrote:
Hello,
I find that Xtrans does particularly well with B&W - no doubt because its CFA layout is designed to favor luminance detail over chroma detail (compared to Bayer, that is). And the tonal rendition is gorgeous straight out of camera.
But Monochrom is in the league of it's own, I am afraid. With no demosaicing and great glass it's just unbeatable when it comes to large prints. I am in a process of printing a show for a major artist, and everyone involved (artist, gallerist, publisher, assistants) is drooling over the quality - the prints look amazing at 40" wide. If I didn't know I would have guessed they were taken with a 4x5 film camera.
Number of R pixels in Bayer is 1/4 total (9/36), in XTrans 8/36, or 12.5% difference. Average distance to nearest similar neighbours from an R or B in Bayer (8 nearest neighbours) is 2.41 pixel widths, 2.46 for XTrans (7 nearest neighbours), or 2% worse in XTrans. But of course one less nearest neighbour, so the numerical similarity is misleading c.f. the 12.5% reduction in R or B and corresponding increase in G. Still, 12.5% is not so much.
So mathematically not a lot different, and seems to me not enough to explain any visible difference in sensor performance between Bayer and XTrans.
Of course the Leica Monochrome is a different matter, and in a league of its own as you say !!
--
mjl599
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | 2 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago |