“Full Frame Equivalence” and Why It Doesn’t Matter

Started Feb 4, 2013 | Discussions thread
Hen3ry
Senior MemberPosts: 9,814Gear list
Like?
Re: “Full Frame Equivalence” and Why It Doesn’t Matter
In reply to thxbb12, Feb 5, 2013

thxbb12 wrote:

But that was the point -- he is arguing:

A) You must look at equivalent generation cameras, you can’t just say FF has "X" advantage, because the vast majority of FF cams out rthere do not -- they are older generation. That's a major point he was making.

Well, you can make the exact same point the other way around: most m43 cameras out there today are old generation as well. Only since the OM-D and GH3, did m43 catch up on the technology front. Previous Oly sensors for instance were quite bad, comparatively worse than older FF sensors (from a technological perspective).

Of course you can, which is why it is silly to make blanket statements.

Cheers, geoff

 Hen3ry's gear list:Hen3ry's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-G6 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 9-18mm 1:4.0-5.6 Panasonic Lumix G Vario 100-300mm F4-5.6 OIS Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 45mm 1:1.8 Panasonic 12-35mm F2.8 +4 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow