
|
Re: Not being a collector...
In reply to jalywol,
3 months ago
|
jalywol wrote:
amalric wrote:
jalywol wrote:
amalric wrote:
When I am out on a walk in the woods, I find I actually use the most variety of lenses. Sometimes there are close ups of plants I want, or long shots, or really wide shots. In that case, I take the 14-140mm as the all purpose solution, but add the 12mm and the 100-30mm, and sometimes the legacy 55mm macro, for the heck of it....and I use them all. If I took just the 12mm or 14mm, I would be frustrated by missing some good long shots or macro opportunities in the woods.
I think what lenses you need really strongly depends on what shooting environment you are in at the time....
-J
Frankly I am past the age where I need to have the equipment to shoot from the galaxies to the insect.
If you haven't set your mind about what you can successfully shoot, what you are good at, you'll just keep on collecting stuff just in case.
Nobody is good at everything. Very few are good at something.
Am.
Geez, and I was agreeing with your original post, in large part. I certainly don't think anyone needs a mondo bag of glass for every event, but heck, my point was that not having the lenses you need, in pursuit of minimalism, is just as silly as having 30 lbs of kit with you for a walk around town.
-J
The Internet World is full of people trying to impose their choices on others, and of lemmings following the marketing claims - as a Mod you should know.
I contend instead that choosing lenses is a v- personal choice - would you go to a painter and impose your own palette?
Even, if you have no idea of the use of a lens, what can you advise? I read about someone who has a 45mm, that is a 90mm eq., living perpetually on his OM-D - it would never do for me.
So we are down to the most universal lenses, which are the well known 35mm eq. and 50mm eq. Everything else is deeply subjective, including the choice primes/zooms.
And yet we see al the time people asking for the Magical Number of Primes, as if it could save their skins
I find these predictions for 2013 interesting:
http://www.petapixel.com/2013/02/04/photographers-finding-new-clients-not-gear-is-biggest-challenge/
Pros will spend almost as much in photography courses than in gear. And they will have at least an idea if they are going to shoot marriage, portrait or documetary. Different gear needed, don't you find?
So let's advise to take photography courses, instead of the Magical Number of Primes
Am.
--
Photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/amalric
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 2 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago |