For David Millier

Started 3 months ago | Discussion thread
xpatUSA
Contributing MemberPosts: 797
Like?
Re: We that while already know - so why the need to go on and on in this obvious case?
In reply to Tom Schum, 3 months ago

Tom Schum wrote:

DMillier wrote:

Yes please!

I suspect (but don't know for sure) that a properly anti-aliased Foveon sensor - even if somewhat reduced in resolution and acutance around Nyquist - would offer a remarkably smooth and beautiful artefact free quality. But I guess we will never find out, as it's going to have to be sharpness all the way.

I disagree. Couldn't a non-sharp lens such as the 50-200mm F4-5.6 DC OS HSM deliver the equivalent of an anti-alias filter on a SD1M?

--
Tom Schum

It could, Tom, but violets would be filtered about 40% "less" than reds with a diffraction-limited approach, would they not? (400nm versus 700nm diffraction) Whether that is good or bad, I have no idea!

On the other hand, I haven't too much trouble with aliasing when I bolt on my high-quality non-EX non-macro DC kit lenses, so maybe you have a point . . .

"properly anti-aliased", Dave? "Somewhat reduced"? "Around Nyquist"? Are you getting vague on us, by any chance?

My SD10 with no sharpening

A little lacking in contrast "below Nyquist" MTF50 should be at least up near 800 lph, IMHO. The good news is an MTF of about 9% at Nyquist meaning that artifacts would be barely visible, would they not? In this case the softness of the capture provided some quite good filtering, eh?

--
Regards,
Ted http://tcktek.blogspot.com
SD10/70mm macro

Edited 3 months ago by xpatUSA
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow