Inexplicable, F900EXR vs X100s

Started Feb 4, 2013 | Discussions thread
stillrds
Regular MemberPosts: 333
Like?
Re: Inexplicable, F900EXR vs X100s
In reply to mainger, Feb 4, 2013

mainger wrote:

This is going to sound insane, but I find that when the screen is very good (like in my RX100), I get mislead into thinking my shots are better than they are, and I find myself being a bit disappointed when I check the images on the computer or print. With the X100 screen, I never assume that, and I always wait until I get to the end product... That's not to say it'd not have been nice to have a better screen, but the (alleged) improvements in AF and other bits are more important than the screen. IMO.

It is not insane although I find it's true with all screens, as long as the screen isn't less than 400k, it's fine. Also worth noting that the screen on the X100 is a bit nicer than many screens that are the same resolution on other cameras.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow