“Full Frame Equivalence” and Why It Doesn’t Matter

Started Feb 4, 2013 | Discussions thread
richarddd
Senior MemberPosts: 2,955Gear list
Like?
Re: “Full Frame Equivalence” and Why It Doesn’t Matter
In reply to RicksAstro, Feb 4, 2013

RicksAstro wrote:

The author was careful to have the facts correct, but I think they could have been presented in a more balanced and less provocative manner, but that wouldn't have attracted controversy and gotten hits...he's employing the Ken Rockwell blog methodology.

That's the real problem with the article. It seems designed to provoke a strong reaction rather than to honestly inform. He was careful to have his facts correct (for the most part), but brushed off inconvenient facts so as to obscure the things contrary to his theme. He usually does a much better job.

The vast majority of time I encounter the equivalence mavens is when they're correcting someone who gets something wrong because they don't understand the issues (sometimes with their own brand of provocative equivalence attitude), rather than the author's notion of equivalence gangs roaming the internet bashing m43 in favor of full frame.

 richarddd's gear list:richarddd's gear list
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Panasonic Lumix G Vario 7-14mm F4 ASPH Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm 1:4-5.6 R Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 45mm 1:1.8 Samyang 7.5mm F3.5 UMC Fisheye MFT +3 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow