“Full Frame Equivalence” and Why It Doesn’t Matter

Equivalence is not about opinions. But, let's say it is; how can one opinion be spot on the money and another opinion not (in this case)?

OK, I understand I shouldn't read your reply that way but rather as you don't agree with me that his article in some way isn't a very good. That's your opinion and you are entitled to it.

Here is what I wrote in the first thread (source)

IMO it's a sad things all this talk about this and that which in the end is about people trying to defend or justify their gear.

Jordan is great, he is a fluent writer and I appreciate his every-now-and-then-reviews and I like discussing with him but here he has managed to make something biased and also containing some minor errors.

It's too much of fanboyism over it.

=======================

OK, there you have my opinion.

At another forum the discussion about this article has taken different ways, for example including samples showing how lenses render differently and how this is connected to the format. The smaller the sensor the bigger the problem it seems. The also not so popular thread 5D vs E-M5 also touches that subject. I hope we some day can get super fast, sharp wide open, with little LoCA and smooth OOF background rendering sort of lenses but I haven't seen that yet.

/Jonas