Om-D vs GH3 for stills image quality, which is better?

Sorry Marco, I've just spent half an hour looking for something to back this up. I've run several advanced google searches on the mirrorlesscentral.com domain, only. I have used the mirrorlesscentral.com search facility. I have read a number of articles tagged "OM-D" on mirrorlesscentral.com, paying attention to articles that have comments on them. I have run more general google searches and read discussions and articles from around the 'net containing the words "OM-D" and "Professional" or "Pro" and "Repair" or "Failure".

Zilch. Not a single quote that I can find that 'suggests' (as you said, originally) what you're purporting was said.

So here's the point - with as much press and attention as this camera has gotten, I'd be surprised if a rumor like this didn't have real legs. I'd be surprised if this was happening and not being reported anywhere at all. IMHO, a number of people 'have it out' for this camera, so I'd be real surprised to find that someone reputable was making this kind of claim without the haters spreading the news far and wide. I mean, I can't prove a negative, and maybe someone reputable has made a statement that closely resembles the one you've made here - anything's possible.

But, really, until we have a source we can check up on, this is uncorroborated rumor and noise, and it really has no place in a serious discussion about these cameras.

If you find your source, I'd appreciate you sharing it. I've tried, but have had zero luck so far.

tex