Om-D vs GH3 for stills image quality, which is better?

ryan2007 wrote:

What I would do is buy both cameras and test for yourself and return what you dot no like. It is rare to actually own both cameras. You will get biased answers from each side.

I am a Panasonic users and went from the GF-1 to GX-1 and now GH-3 and liked the GF-1 & GX-1 so I see no reason to switch.

It depends what you are doing. The nice things about the GH-3 is it is easier to use studio strobes because of the built in connection. Not all DSLR's even have this. The GH-3 has a built in flash that is handy, the OMD does not. The GH-3 has standard connections for an external Mic for video needs which is important to me.

I don't think the Olympus or Panasonic are putting out bad cameras at this level, too much to loose.

I also like the current variety of Panasonic lenses and with the announcement of the 42.5 mm 1.2 and depending on cost I would considering selling my GX-1, 45 2.8 & 45-200 to get that lens.