|
Re: Don't understand the score
In reply to anotherMike,
3 months ago
|
Hi Mike,
I've shot both lenses (f/2.8 VR2 and the f/4) at moderate landscape distances (1/4 of a mile +) as well as indoor at MFD, and have these observations: (more or less mirrors yours)4) TC-14EII : Stopped down to f/8, the f/4 version does better at 0.5 to 1 mile distance. Again, shooting wide open at closer distances, the VR2 does *significantly* better with a TC14 on. It doubles as a 280mm f/4 perfectly well.
5) TC-20E III : I might have gotten a bad copy of TC-20. Both of my lenses does rather poorly. occassionally the VR2 does give something exceptionally sharp (close up of birds within a few meters). at distance it really sucked. images from the f/4 did not impress me no matter what.
My own rough conclusion : the f/4 version might be better for distant landscape, but the VR2 is not exactly that far behind. you lose a stop of aperture. and when the TC-14 is mounted, the difference between 280mm f/4 and 280mm f/5.6 is huge (AF speed, DOF isolation, etc). If one already own the VR2 and actually likes it, the $1400 asking price of the f/4 seems to be a hefty price to pay for a lighter lens for travel. It's a very bitter pill to swallow.
And imagine if oneday a AF-S 80-400 optimized for all-around use is released....
/Patrick
anotherMike wrote:
Personally the F/4 didn't impress me for me to consider buying it - don't read that wrong - by saying it didn't impress me means it wasn't BETTER than anything I already have (the VR2, the 85/1.8G, the 200/2, all of which are just better lenses in the distance ranges *I* work at), but it still is a very good lens, albeit perhaps one optimized more for distance work than closer in. And that's the whole thing I've been harping about for years now - lenses are often optimized for certain distance ranges and tasks, and if that distance range and/or task falls outside of what the test sites use for their tests, the lens isn't going to be reviewed as well; hence, one really needs to evaluate them on their own or read ALL of the sites along with subjective opinions from users who do test at multiple distances.
-m
---
D800E, 16-35/4, 24-70/2.8, 70-200 VR2, TC-20E3, 28-300VR, 24/1.4G, 50/1.8G, 85/1.8G.
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | 4 | ||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | 2 | ||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 2 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 3 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | 2 | ||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 2 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago |