Offsetting cost of this hobby...microstock?

Started Feb 1, 2013 | Discussions thread
tundracamper
Senior MemberPosts: 1,785
Like?
Re: Offsetting cost of this hobby...microstock?
In reply to Alex Notpro, Feb 2, 2013

Alex Notpro wrote:

I've had photos rejected by all major microstock agencies. And it wasn't for excessive post-processing (I rarely do any PP, except very recently experimenting some some Art effects on my new E-PM2, but those aren't serious photos). Do you have any tips for me?

The most common rejection reason that I am aware of on iStock is "artifacting."  That is where the inspector feels the image has been over-processed and the transitions between different regions of the image are "not satisfactory." Of course, I think the inspectors often use that as an excuse when they just don't care for the image.

I did one thing in that area that significantly improved my acceptance rate.  I turned of ANY sharpening in the RAW file - even the in-camera sharpening. These agencies leave it up to the buyer to determine how much sharpening should be applied as that will depend heavily on the usage.  By turning off ANY sort of in-camera of post-processed sharpening, my acceptance rate went way up!

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow