Forum indexOff TopicChange forum

Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.

Started 4 months ago | Discussion thread

Forum

richardplondon

Veteran Member • Posts: 7,482

Like?

Re: Still have a hard time explaining how .....

In reply to Don_Campbell, 3 months ago

The motive is supposed to have been that he was angry with the scientific community discounting his evidence of spiritualism and so played a gotcha.

Conan Doyle had some form as a prankster, in any case.

[As a trick, Conan Doyle sent a letter to five friends that read, "We are discovered. Flee immediately." One of his friends disappeared and Doyle never saw him again.]

Reply Reply with quote Complain

Post (hide subjects)	Posted by	When
Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	PhilPreston3072	4 months ago
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	PhD4	4 months ago
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	Cane	4 months ago
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	Roger99	4 months ago	1
I Googled "carbon dating fossils"	paul_kew	4 months ago	4
Re: I Googled "carbon dating fossils"	PhilPreston3072	4 months ago
Disconnect	CraigWestly	4 months ago	10
Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	CraigWestly	4 months ago	2
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	PhD4	4 months ago
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	Alex Zetetic	4 months ago	1
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	PhilPreston3072	4 months ago
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	ljfinger	4 months ago	2
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	PhilPreston3072	4 months ago
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	ljfinger	4 months ago	3
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	bobn2	4 months ago	1
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	ljfinger	4 months ago
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	bobn2	4 months ago
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	PhilPreston3072	4 months ago
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	ljfinger	4 months ago
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	PhilPreston3072	4 months ago
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	ljfinger	4 months ago
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	PhilPreston3072	4 months ago
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	bobn2	4 months ago
Since you missed it the first time...	Great Bustard	4 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	PhilPreston3072	4 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	bobn2	4 months ago	1
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	PhilPreston3072	4 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	Sante Patate	4 months ago	1
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	PhilPreston3072	4 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	ljfinger	4 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	PhilPreston3072	4 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	ljfinger	4 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	PhilPreston3072	4 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	bobn2	4 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	PhilPreston3072	4 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	bobn2	4 months ago
Responses from the Labs	PhilPreston3072	3 months ago
Re: Responses from the Labs	heinzguderian	3 months ago	1
Re: Responses from the Labs	bobn2	3 months ago
Re: Responses from the Labs	Great Bustard	3 months ago
A few observations do not comprise scientific proof	Don_Campbell	3 months ago
Re: A few observations do not comprise scientific proof	Great Bustard	3 months ago
Re: A few observations do not comprise scientific proof	Don_Campbell	3 months ago
Re: A few observations do not comprise scientific proof	steve660	3 months ago	2
Re: A few observations do not comprise scientific proof	bobn2	3 months ago
Re: A few observations do not comprise scientific proof	steve660	3 months ago
Re: A few observations do not comprise scientific proof	Don_Campbell	3 months ago
Re: Responses from the Labs - guaranteed to fail	sherwoodpete	3 months ago
Third letter says it all...	lol101	3 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	bobn2	4 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	PhilPreston3072	4 months ago
Re: Since you missed it the first time...	bobn2	4 months ago
A little more on this..	bobn2	4 months ago	1
Re: A little more on this..	PhilPreston3072	4 months ago
The FOX "News" of science	Great Bustard	4 months ago
Re: A little more on this..	bobn2	4 months ago	1
Re: A little more on this..	PhilPreston3072	4 months ago
Re: A little more on this..	Don_Campbell	4 months ago
Re: A little more on this..	Starshot	4 months ago	1
Re: A little more on this..	Don_Campbell	4 months ago
Re: A little more on this..	Starshot	4 months ago	2
Re: A little more on this..	Don_Campbell	4 months ago
Re: A little more on this..	bobn2	4 months ago
If creationists could see themselves	Brian D. Schneider	4 months ago	2
Re: Refutation of recent dinosaurs.	bobn2	4 months ago
What's your point? : )	Great Bustard	4 months ago
Bookmarked...	Great Bustard	4 months ago
Re: Bookmarked...	boggis the cat	4 months ago	1
hey Craig	edwardaneal	4 months ago
See link	CraigWestly	4 months ago
Re: See link	PhilPreston3072	4 months ago
Another forgery ...	Sante Patate	4 months ago	4
Re: Another forgery ...See for yourself.	PhilPreston3072	4 months ago
Re: Another forgery ...See for yourself.	Sante Patate	4 months ago	1
Re: Another forgery ...See for yourself.	PhilPreston3072	4 months ago
Re: Another forgery ...See for yourself.	Sante Patate	4 months ago	1
Re: Another forgery ...See for yourself.	PhilPreston3072	4 months ago
Re: Another forgery ...See for yourself.	bobn2	4 months ago	1
when Cold Fusion was a hot topic	Leo360	4 months ago	1
Carbon dating is only accurate to around 6.5 Thousand years, then that method breaks down.	lylejk	4 months ago
Re: Carbon dating is only accurate to around 6.5 Thousand years, then that method breaks down.	KEVZPHOTOS	4 months ago	1
Re: Carbon dating is only accurate to around 6.5 Thousand years, then that method breaks down.	PhilPreston3072	4 months ago
Re: Carbon dating is only accurate to around 6.5 Thousand years, then that method breaks down.	KEVZPHOTOS	4 months ago	1
Jericho is 11,000 Years Old	KEVZPHOTOS	4 months ago
Portraiture	sherwoodpete	4 months ago
Re: Carbon dating is only accurate to around 6.5 Thousand years, then that method breaks down.	Roger99	4 months ago
You've been told, over and over. You never learn.	ljfinger	4 months ago	1
but	edwardaneal	4 months ago
Re: but	ljfinger	4 months ago	1
Re: but	edwardaneal	4 months ago
Re: but	ljfinger	4 months ago	1
Grasping at straws...	CFynn	4 months ago	3
How it really happened :)	Brian D. Schneider	4 months ago	2
Re: How it really happened :)	ljfinger	4 months ago
Classic! (nt)	Great Bustard	4 months ago
Re: Grasping at straws...	Roger99	4 months ago	2
Re: You've been told, over and over. You never learn.	PhilPreston3072	4 months ago
Re: You've been told, over and over. You never learn.	ljfinger	4 months ago	1
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	RossAndrew	4 months ago
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	CFynn	4 months ago	1
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	ljfinger	4 months ago
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	CFynn	4 months ago
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	ljfinger	4 months ago
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	CFynn	4 months ago
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	PhilPreston3072	4 months ago
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	bobn2	4 months ago	4
What's your point? : )	Great Bustard	4 months ago
Re: What's your point? : )	ljfinger	4 months ago
Re: What's your point? : )	bobn2	4 months ago	4
Re: What's your point? : )	ljfinger	4 months ago
I keep saying...	Great Bustard	4 months ago
When I was a kid	Chato	4 months ago
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	Alex Zetetic	4 months ago	1
As a person of faith, it annoys me to no end . . .	Marianne Oelund	4 months ago
Re: As a person of faith, it annoys me to no end . . .	bobn2	4 months ago
What a joke	rhlpetrus	4 months ago	4
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	Don_Campbell	4 months ago	1
Re: Dino Dating Conflicts: Carbon dating suggests less than 40,000 years old.	peevee1	4 months ago
Still have a hard time explaining how .....	lylejk	4 months ago
Re: Still have a hard time explaining how .....	bobn2	4 months ago	1
What's your point? : )	Great Bustard	4 months ago
Re: Still have a hard time explaining how .....	peevee1	4 months ago
Re: Still have a hard time explaining how .....	bobn2	4 months ago
Re: Still have a hard time explaining how .....	Leo360	4 months ago
Iguanas = Dinosaurs???	mamallama	4 months ago	2
Re: Iguanas = Dinosaurs???	lylejk	4 months ago
Re: Iguanas = Dinosaurs???	mamallama	4 months ago	1
Re: Iguanas = Dinosaurs???	lylejk	4 months ago
Re: Still have a hard time explaining how .....	Roger99	4 months ago	1
Re: Still have a hard time explaining how .....	bobn2	4 months ago
Re: Still have a hard time explaining how .....	Don_Campbell	4 months ago
Re: Still have a hard time explaining how .....	sherwoodpete	4 months ago
Re: Still have a hard time explaining how .....	Don_Campbell	4 months ago
Re: Still have a hard time explaining how .....	richardplondon	3 months ago
Re: Still have a hard time explaining how .....	Leo360	4 months ago

Keyboard shortcuts:

FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads

Color scheme? Blue / Yellow

Editorial content

Product database

Community

I see alot of mistakes in composition on this ...	87
Why are DSLRs left home 90.2% of the time	87
This is why to shoot in RAW	83
Does anybody shoot 16:9?	75
Nikon AF-S 85mm f/1.4 lens not so hot.	55
What's your favorite full frame walkaround lens?	52
NEX-6 or NEX-7?	48
* Wed C&C (No Theme) Thread, Ed. 265, 13 05 22 *	46
Did Nikon screw up?	44
E-P5 anyone?	38
Computer Screen sharp as an iPad Retina	38
The new normal.	37
Panasonic 14/2.5	36
Micro Four Thirds body deflation	36
OH MY GOD THE GX2 OH MY GOD	35
Why doesn't anyone like the GX-1?	32
Show us ONE of your recent favorite picture and...	29
Unlucky Me - Bad Nikon 17-35mm f/2.8D	28
R.I.P. Professional Photographers	28
Really Dumb camera can't take photos	28