
|
Re: It is offical. Panasonic 43mm F1.2 and 150mm F2.8 on lens roadmap.
In reply to idiotekniQues,
3 months ago
|
idiotekniQues wrote:
Louis_Dobson wrote:
43 f1.2, 85 f2.4 in FF terms, was very much needed. Will be fine for portraits.
--
www.flickr.com/photos/acam http://thegentlemansnapper.blogspot.com
http://admiringlight.com/blog/full-frame-equivalence-and-why-it-doesnt-matter/
\
have to agree with this article, your equivalency in FF terms is pretty much frivolous
Hi idiotekniQues (?),
That is nice and dandy. Jordan is a fluid writer and I usually enjoy his forum posts and opinions when he posts reviews of new gear and such.
But, he is also very often defending micro 4/3. In his article he dismisses some FF advantages using the arguments such as "as I already chosed the E-M5 knowing about the drawbacks they don't count anymore". Then it's not strange he comes up with the conclusion the way he does.
Using Jordan's article as basis for claiming somebody's use of "equivalency in FF terms" as frivoulus can be OK for fanboys only. Would you make the same claim if we had some food and beer and a chat about photography face to face?
A new and skewed article doesn't mean equivalency theories, as expressed and discussed through the years, suddenly ceased to work. Physics didn't change January 26.
/Jonas
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 months ago | 3 | ||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 2 | ||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 3 | ||
| 3 months ago | 2 | ||
| 3 months ago | 2 | ||
| 3 months ago | 2 | ||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | 4 | ||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | 2 | ||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago |