It is offical. Panasonic 43mm F1.2 and 150mm F2.8 on lens roadmap.

Started 3 months ago | Discussions thread
Louis_Dobson
Forum ProPosts: 26,274
Like?
Re: It is offical. Panasonic 43mm F1.2 and 150mm F2.8 on lens roadmap.
In reply to idiotekniQues, 3 months ago

The article is fine until it gets to the the aperture equivalence fallacy (as he calls it), at which point he seems to forget diffraction.  Or to put it another way, his summary of the "equivalence" argument is excellent, his attempted demolition confused, if not plain wrong.
Anyway, my generation grew up with 35mm SLRs, I carried on thinking in 35mm equivalents when I moved to film medium format, I carried on doing so when I moved to FT and then FF and then MFT, and I'm going to carry on now.
An MFT 43mm f1.2 would enable me to do the same job as an 85mm f2.4, a lens and setting I can immediately relate to from personal experience.  I've just ordered a 75mm f1.8 (150 f3.6) though, and since I don't do a lot of portraits any more I can't justify both.

idiotekniQues wrote:

Louis_Dobson wrote:

43 f1.2, 85 f2.4 in FF terms, was very much needed. Will be fine for portraits.

--
www.flickr.com/photos/acam http://thegentlemansnapper.blogspot.com

http://admiringlight.com/blog/full-frame-equivalence-and-why-it-doesnt-matter/

\

have to agree with this article, your equivalency in FF terms is pretty much frivolous

--
-------------------------------
www.pixelsquish.com

--
www.flickr.com/photos/acam http://thegentlemansnapper.blogspot.com

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow