
|
Re: Why is the Fuji RAW file bigger than Sony and Olympus?
In reply to nixda,
3 months ago
|
nixda wrote:
I think it is 2) The Fuji files can be compressed, using something as simple as bzip2, by up to 80% (depending on the scene). Nikon losslessly compressed files can't be further compressed; they seem to have figures it out quite well.
I'll check that out. If I can at least compress them on my computer it would be great. To reply to others here - IQ has very little to do with the file size. That is debatable and would depend on compression schemes (losslessly-compressing red, green and blue as contiguous parts rather than interspersed, for example, may have an effect depending on chroma noise, for example), but not by this much.
I wish FUJI officials would look at these forums and give official responses, though... They might get some good ideas too
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 4 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago |