2
|
Re: Why hasn't Nikon released a f/2.8 DX zoom?
In reply to bseng,
3 months ago
|
bseng wrote:
Other than the 17-55? I don't consider the 17-55 to be an option because it's big, heavy, and expensive which sort of goes against the philosophy of DX.
They need one in the $600-900 range.
It's big, heavy, and expensive because it's an f/2.8 zoom.
There is no philosophy of DX (certainly not when DX was conceived) - DX came about because FX sensors were simply too expensive and difficult to make in the beginning.
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | 2 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 3 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | 2 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 2 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 2 | ||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | 2 | ||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | 2 | ||
| 3 months ago | 2 | ||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | 2 | ||
| 3 months ago | 1 | ||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago |