Fuji x100 vs micro four thirds ?

Started Jan 30, 2013 | Discussions thread
malabito
Senior MemberPosts: 1,114Gear list
Like?
Re: Fuji x100 vs micro four thirds ?
In reply to Marco Cinnirella, Jan 31, 2013

Hi Marco I had the Fuji for quite some time and then got the omd. Sold the Fuji afterwards so no comparative shots to show, but from my experience the Fuji was definitely slower in shooting, focusing, response, much much slower. But even thou some people praise the omd for its quality to me the x100 images have some mojo that made them better then the results I am getting with the omd. it's not about high ISO, it's about the files, something about them that to me look better then the files of the Olympus.

I do like my omd, and its a much versatile system, faster, responsive,,etc. image quality is great, but I think is missing something. Don't know yet what it is, wish the x100 was as responsive as the omd. Some examples.

OMD

X100

-- hide signature --

Nikon 20mm 2.8, nikon 28mm 2.8 manual focus, Nikon 50mm 1.4, nikon 105mm 2.8 VR, nikon 70-200mm 2.8, sb-900, sb-800, SB-600, ...fuji x100, Leica M6
www.ailukewitsch.com
http://ailukewitsch.wordpress.com/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/malabito

 malabito's gear list:malabito's gear list
Sony RX1 Nikon D800 Nikon Df Nikon AF Nikkor 20mm f/2.8D Nikon AF Nikkor 24mm f/2.8D +5 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow