
|
Re: Why doesn't Nikon use 2 processors to achieve higher fps?
In reply to kb2zuz,
5 months ago
|
kb2zuz wrote:
So the D600 could probably have been faster with the processor it has. It was more likely the shutter/mirrorbox that was the limitation on that camera
^^^ This
(and they may well be pushing that to the limit already with the oil/dust problem with oil coming off the mirror mechanism).
It wouldn't matter how many times a second it happened, the mirror up/down and the shutter speed is the same each time, whether it's once a second or X times a second.
Yep.
More reasonable approach would be to make a D750 based of the 16MP chip in the D4 and just limit it to 8fps.
Nikon's strategy is curious. I'm not sure we're going to see a D750, but it certainly wouldn't be hard to do.
I am curious as to how many people would buy the following, assuming body build (feature set) stays as it currently is but the price slides a little with the different sensors:
I guess I'm most curious if the feature set or the sensor would be the driving factor if all else was equal. I think a lot of sensible people know they don't need 36 MPs but most definitely would like the very best in AF, metering, etc. Personally I think Nikon should have had two 24 MP bodies and one 36 MP body instead of the other way around.
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | 1 | ||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | 3 | ||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago |