The no lens hood epidemic

Started 4 months ago | Discussion thread
PhD4
Senior MemberPosts: 3,616
Like?
Re: The no lens hood epidemic
In reply to Biggs23, 4 months ago

Biggs23 wrote:

PhD4 wrote:

Biggs23 wrote:

PhD4 wrote:

Hoods are for flare, period.

When stating something as absolute fact, please be prepared to offer references when asked.

So I'll ask: according to whom?

Simple.

Lens manufacturers.

Call one and ask them if while under warranty, they cover damages to a lens because the hood didn't stay on or protect it enough.

Go on.... we'll wait.

You say that they 'are' for flare, period. However, they 'are' for lens protection as well. How can I say that factually? Simple, because I've used them for that purpose. Therefore, definitionally, they 'are' for that as well. Whether a lens manufacturer will acknowledge that and open themselves up to more damage claims is not relevant to what something 'is'.

In that case they 'are' for picking up dog poop too.

I guess the manufacturers will replace mine if it breaks in the process, then.

Right ?

Still doesn't change the fact that they are not made for that, and thus the OP is whining for nothing and the person you were trying to correct.... is still correct.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow